Already knew this. And to say "he knew what he was going to get" is BS because nobody knows what their going to get when drafting players.
Mankins played because he was a first round pick. Hobbs and Sanders didn't start because they were good, they started because they didn't have anybody else. Get real dude. Cassel started because Brady tore his ACL. And Kaczur started but was never anything special. There's tons of people on this board that wouldn't mind seeing Kaczur out the door.
I'm sorry, you clearly didn't read what I wrote concerning there 2009 draft. I wrote that this looks like their overall best draft class between the years of '04-'09.
I remember when Mike Nolan came out and said he wanted Mankins for whatever reason. I knew BB is friends with Pat Hill.
Homers will deny it, but you guys are in the minority regarding how well the Pats drafted over the last several years. Even Pats fans favorite Reiss is starting to admit it.
I also find it funny when people defend McKenzie for tearing his ACL yet call Chad Jackson a bust.
First, I never said all the Pats drafts were good. I totally disagree with you about 2005. They had four starters on the 2007 team that was perfect in the regular season. That is a good draft. You also look to be wrong about the 2009 draft so far. Yes, McKenzie is gone, but Chung, Vollmer, Brace, Butler, and Tate are or could be starters; Edelman could be a starter or a valued contributor, Ingram is a very good long snapper, and Pryor is a good rotation guy. I am not a fan of the 2006 draft or the the 2008. The 2007 draft isn't good without the trades, but not as bad as people make it since most of the picks were in the sixth and seventh round.
Second, like most of your arguments, you take a legitimate point and blow everything out of proportion to make things worse than they look. That is why most people don't take you seriously. You go out of your way to prove your point that you make ridiculous arguments (Cassell was a one year wonder, Kazcur would have been cut if he was healthy, Mankins was a lucky pick and only played because he was a first round pick).
Third, in reference to Cassel, if all he ever became was a #2 QB on this team, it was a good pick. Cassel was a late seventh round pick. Most seventh round picks don't even make it to year two on a roster. The fact that Cassel stepped in for Brady (isn't that what #2 QBs do in stepping in when the starter is injured), played well enough to win 11 games, and netted the Pats a 2nd rounder just makes him a spectacular pick for where he was drafted.
Fourth, I was always a Jackson defender. So you are confusing me with someone else. It was Jackson's maturity and dedication that ultimately made him a bust. The fact that the Bills just cut him (it is like his fourth team in two years) proves that he is a bust.
Fifth, as for Kazcur, I am not the biggest fan of his, but he has started most of the last three years and was scheduled to start this year.