TyronePoole
Banned
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2012
- Messages
- 1,335
- Reaction score
- 1
We have no way of knowing if the next 31 teams would have drafted Tavon because teams are more protective of their draft board than a Amish father is
protective of his daughter's hymen. Hence there's no true basis to call something a reach unless you had post-draft access to all 32 team draft boards and even then that's all hindsight.
But nah, I'm probably wrong and you can totally know what other teams are going to do because they aren't cloak and dagger about the draft at all and everyone who wasn't picked at the exact number that is a consensus of internet football experts was a reach.
Interestingly, here's a post from LolDeus admitting as much and then going on to describe fans post hoc draft analysis as a "system." Something something cake and eating it.
http://www.patsfans.com/new-england...tter-if-your-pick-considered-reach-page4.html
Deus Irae said:This quote is true, for the most part. However, we all know that the teams don't hand out their draft boards to the media prior to the draft. What they do hand out is as much misinformation as possible, in the hopes of throwing other teams off about the players they want. They then follow up the draft with a host of new lies ("he was the #1 receiver on our board even though we picked him in the 7th round", etc...).
This is why we can't evaluate 'reaches' on a team by team basis, and have to base it on the general pool of knowledge. Teams leave the media, and the fans, no choice but to use an alternate method of evaluating how the draft went, as far as 'winners', 'losers', 'reaches', 'sliders', etc... The fact that the system being used isn't perfect does not mean that the system should be tossed out. Sometimes in life, second-rate is the best you can do.
btw, iirc this was around the time that Deus felt it really important to dogmatically announce that Mayo was a reach. "But we have no choice but to talk out of our asses." lol