- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
That's a really good point about Cassel's attitude/work ethic, and probably the difference in why he got to stick around and KOC didn't. Like you said, we may never know the true story.
True, and there's also their relative costs. Cassel got paid $525k in 2008, vs. $1.28M for O'Connell in 2009. It's easier to justify keeping a developmental project around at Cassel's price than O'Connell's, although I also think that mayoclinic's right on as well- they kept Cassel because he showed them something, and they cut O'Connell because he didn't. Their salaries may have moved the bar a bit, but the work ethic and improvement that one demonstrated and the other didn't would pretty much have to be *the* reason.