dtbrks
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Aug 23, 2006
- Messages
- 3,877
- Reaction score
- 1,978
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Sure, and my point is that once you hit the pro game your college ranking doesn't mean squat. In many cases it's a detriment because whatever environment that helped you perform against your peers in college is now gone. A "full evaluated acquisition" isn't a guarantee of success at the next level, yet so many here get so upset because someone with a specific draft ranking/rating doesn't pan out. IMHO they should understand a draft pick is nothing more than a lottery pick. The environment that allowed them to succeed in college is gone. Some thrive at the next level, others fail. I wish my college GPA guaranteed success for the rest of my life. If so I'd be goddamn rich and retired by now. Not that I'm complaining, but life just ain't that simple.
Me too, but my momma still loves me...not that he doesn't have me on ignore
Nope not me. I give more credit to Caserio than Lombardi.I don't know if that is the case or not, the part on Lombardi's part in "overruling his scouts" and drafting Easley was based on a Shalise Manza Young article, and I have no clue whether or not that is correct.
The part about him having influence with the Patriots free agent pickups is because I was opining a year or so ago about what an amazing 3 year super-successful roll BB was on with his poaching of players from other clubs, and another poster (actually, I thought it was you, but I've never given you credit because I don't remember for sure) pointed out that this "roll" started about the time Lombardi came on board, and I thought "huh, that's right!". If it was you pointing that out, credit is now given.
.....If not, and I'm putting words in your mouth, ....ummm, never mind.
That unfortunately does leave the Pats responsible for his ~$1 million salary...but it also says so much about how he's viewed around the league. Perhaps Volin's article came out a day too soon.
“I’m more curious about how many teams claim him than if he gets claimed,” former Eagles and Browns executive Joe Banner said on Wednesday. “This is a gift to someone.”
Imagine a poll on this site 2 days ago about what Easley might be worth in a trade, and how many would have checked "zilch, nada, squat"
Questioning Belichick's draft decisions is not quitting on the team.
-In spite of picking 30 more players than the Jests during the Belichick era there are only 3 or 4 more Pats' drafted players currently playing in the NFL, and one of those is Tom Brady who was drafted 16 years ago.
-The Pats have picked 20 more players than the Bills during the Belichick era but there are 10 more Bills drafted players still in the NFL.
And in the case of Easley, Belichick deserves some criticism. It was a bad pick.
Far be it from me to defend Deus, but in this particular case, I remember him screaming for Stephan Tuitt.
he was dead right on Easley, and this is a bust pick - could have been a great pick if Easley lived up to his god-given talent. but no, in this particularly instance, Deus is right.
But we'll always have Jamie Collins for future arguments (not that he doesn't have me on ignore)...
We're supposed to hear who claimed him soon, right?
Please don't be the Donkos.
That unfortunately does leave the Pats responsible for his ~$1 million salary...but it also says so much about how he's viewed around the league. Perhaps Volin's article came out a day too soon.
Now that he's a FA, if he's signed by another team for any amount of money for 2016 are the Patriots still on the hook for that no matter what?
There is offset language, so the Pats would only be responsible for the difference.Now that he's a FA, if he's signed by another team for any amount of money for 2016 are the Patriots still on the hook for that no matter what?
Ok makes sense that was kind of the question I was having trouble finding an answer to - in this or any scenario is it possible for a guy to get paid 'salary' by two teams. For this situation it's not much - a million here, a million there I suppose.There is offset language, so the Pats would only be responsible for the difference.
I don't know how the timing works though, whether they get that cap room back as soon as he signs a new contract (and lose it if he's cut again), in small chunks as he earns his paycheck each week during the season, or perhaps not at all during 2016 if it is applied as a credit to their 2017 cap.