PatsFaninAZ
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 4,091
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The Onion tweeted "Auburn needs to find a way to communicate over Oregon's extremely loud uniforms." I LOLd.Interesting uniform for Oregon.
Why isn't Darvin Adams mentioned as a pro prospect? The few Auburn games I've watched he has been really impressive.
As a fan of a Pac-10 team, the thing that bugs me the most about the Pac-10 is how much conference pride most pac-10 fans have. Cheering for your team's rival during bowl season "for the good of the conference" is something that has always pissed me off.The Onion tweeted "Auburn needs to find a way to communicate over Oregon's extremely loud uniforms." I LOLd.
I live in Duck territory and the two things that always bugged me were their silly Unis and their gimmick offense. I always liked the Pac-10 because most of the teams ran a pro offense. I guess those lines are blurred these days.
For me its just a matter of feeling the conference routinely gets neglected or underrated by the football world so any championship is a good championship. Things should change next year with the new teams and shift to divisional play which will keep some of the good teams from playing each other and trashing their records until a championship game is played.As a fan of a Pac-10 team, the thing that bugs me the most about the Pac-10 is how much conference pride most pac-10 fans have. Cheering for your team's rival during bowl season "for the good of the conference" is something that has always pissed me off.
I'd love him on the Patriots but that cheap shot from Fairley was about as cheap and bushleague as it gets. Slamming the head of someone about half your size into the ground right after he was tackled makes you look like a p*ssy yourself.
Any chance Fairley can play 3-4 DE? That guy is flat-out dominant. He's having a game like Suh's last collegiate game. Knows how to play big when he needs to.
I know obviously he'd be playing there instead of nose. I just mean, can he play this dominantly in the right gap system for our 3-4? Or is his play suited to a 4-3 DT like he's doing at Auburn now?He would translate to a DE in our 3-4. Fairley has absolutely controlled the line of scrimmage in this game tonight, and was single handely the reason why Oregon didn't score just now. Anybody see him drop back into coverage earlier too?
I know obviously he'd be playing there instead of nose. I just mean, can he play this dominantly in the right gap system for our 3-4? Or is his play suited to a 4-3 DT like he's doing at Auburn now?
He's certainly made a believer out of me.
I do think Oregon was a victim of their own system there, they probably should have called a time out and got James in for the full series.
He's been taking on double teams all night. I'd say he'd be alright in our two gap system.