Welcome to PatsFans.com

Offensive & Defensive snaps for 2010

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Deus Irae, Jan 4, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,451
    Likes Received:
    287
    Ratings:
    +738 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    Reiss has this on his blog. I think there are some very interesting numbers here:

    Offensive snaps for 2010 season - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston

    Thanks to Mike Reiss for charting this all season, and people should give the man his due and click on the link to read his analysis.
    Last edited by a moderator: Jan 5, 2011
  2. Sicilian

    Sicilian On the Roster

    Joined:
    Dec 6, 2007
    Messages:
    4,885
    Likes Received:
    104
    Ratings:
    +229 / 1 / -2

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    Reiss has been great for this all year long. Kudos to him for the effort!

    Gronk having that many snaps makes sense from a strategy standpoint (with Alge being mostly a blocker and Aaron being mostly a receiver, Gronk is the only TE who would fit both roles equally well), it's still surprising that he was able to make that kind of contribution as a rookie. Way to go Gronk!
  3. BradyManny

    BradyManny Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2006
    Messages:
    9,698
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    I've had to eat crow in many threads here, so I'm going to pat myself on the back for calling for multiple TE sets and less spread/gun since long before we even drafted our TE studs.
  4. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    41,451
    Likes Received:
    287
    Ratings:
    +738 / 44 / -47

    Disable Jersey

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    I think those numbers tell us a lot about the offense. I look particularly at:

    1.) Gronk being behind only Brady in snaps taken

    2.) Branch overtaking Tate despite coming late to the party

    3.) Woodhead not being far behind BJGE despite coming to the team late
    Last edited: Jan 4, 2011
  5. Kasmir

    Kasmir Rookie

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2006
    Messages:
    581
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    As I pointed out in the Woodhead thread, Woodhead had almost as many snaps as BJGE despite missing the first two games and most of the last. When he's played, Woodhead actually is on the field more than BJGE.
  6. Calciumee

    Calciumee PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2008
    Messages:
    4,600
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    #3 Jersey

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    Which makes BJGE's 1000 yards even more impressive :)
  7. Fencer

    Fencer Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2006
    Messages:
    7,636
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +17 / 0 / -1

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    Faulk and Woodhead combined are a little behind BJGE and Taylor combined, but just a little. 48% vs. 44% That's why I assert the Faulk/Woodhead role is about as important as the traditional RB role, and hence why I think there's roster room for both Faulk and Woodhead in it.

    Branch and Moss combined are very near Welker, around 70% each.

    I'd say the default set is:


    • Brady
    • Gronkowski
    • Welker
    • Branch
    • Hernandez (when healthy)
    • Whichever of BJGE or Woodhead makes more sense.

    But as we know, there's huge variation around that.
  8. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,395
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +213 / 14 / -2

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    I would say that the 2nd TE is whichever of Crumpler and Hernandez that makes more sense.

    Also, I was interested to see that Tate was in on almost 50% of the defensive reps.

    Last edited: Jan 4, 2011
  9. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,085
    Likes Received:
    70
    Ratings:
    +168 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    If you told me back on Labor Day that Faulk, Morris, Taylor and Maroney would get on the field for less than 1/4 of the Pats' offensive plays this year and then asked me to bet an over/under on 13.5 wins this year, I would have taken the under regardless of the odds.


    I wonder if Mark LeVoir gets a bonus for actually getting on the field this year?
  10. jmt57

    jmt57 Moderator Staff Member PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2005
    Messages:
    13,085
    Likes Received:
    70
    Ratings:
    +168 / 0 / -0

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    Reiss now has the defensive snaps, and his analysis in the link below:

    2010 Patriots defensive snap count - New England Patriots Blog - ESPN Boston

    Based on who got the most snaps, I guess the Pats base defense is now a 1-5-5 rather than a 3-4. Of the six players on the field most often, they were all DBs with the exception of Jerod Mayo.
  11. ATippett56

    ATippett56 Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2005
    Messages:
    9,794
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +21 / 0 / -0

  12. JackBauer

    JackBauer On the Roster

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    15,645
    Likes Received:
    161
    Ratings:
    +297 / 6 / -5

    Meriweather played the third most snaps, you say? Clearly he is a liability, and should be jettisoned with all deliberate speed.
  13. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,395
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +213 / 14 / -2

    Re: Offensive snaps for 2010

    Our "base" defense is the 3-4. In the 3-4, it is not unusual for the #2 DL to have only 45% of the reps (as Warren did last year and Warren did this year). The unusual thing about this year's line numbers in that Wilfork was in there so much.

    As yes, as would be expected from a 14-2 team, we were in the nickel a lot. Because of our weakness at CB depth (Wilhite #4 and no #5), the safeties got lots and lots of work.

  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,395
    Likes Received:
    91
    Ratings:
    +213 / 14 / -2

    Apparently it is only Belichick, the staff and the probowl voters who value Meriweather's play.

    Posters here know much better.

    Last edited: Jan 5, 2011
  15. MoLewisrocks

    MoLewisrocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2005
    Messages:
    19,949
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +29 / 0 / -0

    Yet the much maligned James Sanders put up similar stats in fewer snaps while Chung put up better stats in fewer snaps due to injury as opposed to losing his starting slot due to attitude adjustment. Go figure...
  16. JackBauer

    JackBauer On the Roster

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2005
    Messages:
    15,645
    Likes Received:
    161
    Ratings:
    +297 / 6 / -5

    Excellent argument. By that logic, we can conclude Suh is pretty much the greatest player ever while Wilfork is a notch above pedestrian.
  17. unoriginal

    unoriginal Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,209
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +41 / 2 / -1

    If you add up the totals for each position group, and discarding the two offensive players, you end up with:

    Code:
    DB 	5224
    LB 	4335
    DL 	2550
    which works out to
    Code:
    DL	2.3
    LB 	3.9
    DB 	4.7
    per snap. So a 2-4-5 big nickel.
  18. RutgersFan

    RutgersFan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2010
    Messages:
    34
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    From the defensive list, and then include special teams, I would be willing to bet McCourty played more snaps than any rookie in the NFL and more than almost all players in the NFL. Rookie wall?? More like a 3' fence.
  19. BradyFTW!

    BradyFTW! PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2007
    Messages:
    16,376
    Likes Received:
    35
    Ratings:
    +99 / 2 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Shhh... no matter how sarcastic you are, I wouldn't put it past this place for that narrative to catch on. Considering how quickly they turned on Seymour, turning on Wilfork isn't exactly out of the question.

    Agreed. though; anyone who solely uses stats to compare safety play probably isn't worth listening to. "My guy got more interceptions and tackles so he's better herp derp!" Bottom line, Belichick wouldn't have Meriweather on the field for 80+% of snaps if he thought the guys behind him could do his job better than he could.
    Last edited: Jan 5, 2011
  20. West Philly Patriot

    West Philly Patriot Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2009
    Messages:
    2,800
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +60 / 3 / -3

    #12 Jersey

    Point. Blank. Period.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>