- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 17,873
- Reaction score
- 8,919
The 2007 Patriots were better than the current Packers and they were beaten. On any given day, strange things happen in sport.Not sure anyone can unfortunately...
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The 2007 Patriots were better than the current Packers and they were beaten. On any given day, strange things happen in sport.Not sure anyone can unfortunately...
The 2007 Patriots were better than the current Packers and they were beaten. On any given day, strange things happen in sport.
The 2007 Patriots were better than the current Packers and they were beaten. On any given day, strange things happen in sport.
Yeah, I think of the Rams and break into cold sweats Some teams just have your number
I can't think of a game more similar to last year's Pats/Browns game...well, except for maybe you guys playing the Browns last year too :bricks: I know the pain...
my professional opinion is that 7pts would be a good thing here.
Pherein, your opinion, Graham or Gronk? It's close.
He does, defenses are having a tough time covering him.I like both, but I think Gronk is a better player right now. He runs better after the catch. They both have the same good hands and height . Im really not sure why Gronk is not getting converge , but he's better right now, in my opinion
Graham is like a bigger Dallas Clark...that's quite an offensive weapon to go along with Colston and Mighty Sproles....not quite sure how you defense Bree's and his one step drop/inside slant down at the goal line except getting hands up...if the Pats didn't have BB, I doubt you could do better than Sean Payton as a head coach.
You can be sure one or two drives will be extended thanks to miraculous PI calls on the defense that weren't there.don't forget Eli's miracle throws, we haven't he had a few VS SF, he's very dangerous