pherein
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 30, 2009
- Messages
- 4,561
- Reaction score
- 1,788
Re: Divisional Round Breakdown: Packers at 49ers
no, with out turn overs the 49ers lose this game also. So, the 49ers offence cant win, alone. Thats very important vs the Pats mayo. You dont turn the ball over.
Theses turn overs are not the de facto.
GB has no run game , but ran fine against them. I think the weaker teams in the NFC are winning and thats just good for NE, even in the AFC. I think you would rather play Ravens then PM and Denver.
You seriosly think playing GB and rogers would be better than a rookie in the SB?
We destroted this guy with the worst defence.
Don't agree with you on either count:
- SF was the better team. More physical, more balanced. Vastly superior D. Capers made it easy for them, but I think they were just the better team, and would have won. Should have won.
- Not necessarily a good outcome for NE, though it's irrelevant right now. And if Seattle beats Atlanta I still think they will beat SF. But I've said SF and Seattle are the two best teams in the NFC for months now, as I've said the Pats and Houston are the two best teams in the AFC.
no, with out turn overs the 49ers lose this game also. So, the 49ers offence cant win, alone. Thats very important vs the Pats mayo. You dont turn the ball over.
Theses turn overs are not the de facto.
GB has no run game , but ran fine against them. I think the weaker teams in the NFC are winning and thats just good for NE, even in the AFC. I think you would rather play Ravens then PM and Denver.
You seriosly think playing GB and rogers would be better than a rookie in the SB?
We destroted this guy with the worst defence.
Last edited: