- Joined
- Aug 11, 2006
- Messages
- 25,362
- Reaction score
- 10,253
These judges are Suppose to be reviewing the merits of bermans decision to find in bradys favour, not analyzing the evidence to whether brady was guilty in the first place. Somethings fishy here.but there is a huge difference between arguing under oath and not.........yesterday's hearing seems to be more about what **** you can make stick to the walls and not factual truths
Last edited: