loloooooooooooo
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2009
- Messages
- 248
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Colts still had a Reggie Wayne.
But I agree that this offense doesn't go from #1 in scoring to below average. I still think we're a top 5 scoring offense without Randy Moss.
Now we have some good tight ends finally, and still have Welker. I will miss Moss, but the WR position isn't as important as the QB position, and the Raiders already shown us that. BB is confident in our Tight ends so I believe our Offense will be great still
the premise of this thread is off. Brady won 3 super bowls without Moss—two more than Manning has with OR without Harrison.
The Pats CAN do fine without Moss.
That does not mean the trade was good.
The two are mutually exclusive.
Do either of you (previous two posters) trust anyone else on the roster to run up the seam and grab an over the shoulder pass one handed for a TD vs a top 3 corner? We had a freak of nature and even if he was just playing decoy most of the game, he could make some catches only 2 or 3 guys who ever played the game could catch. I'm hoping the scheme adjustment after this trade is dramatic. The opposing team's top CB will now be on a much less player who I doubt will be doubled as much as Moss was, now freeing up a saftey.
Now we have some good tight ends finally, and still have Welker. I will miss Moss, but the WR position isn't as important as the QB position, and the Raiders already shown us that. BB is confident in our Tight ends so I believe our Offense will be great still
Because Manning has a defense to back him up if his offense fails..thats why