amazinPats
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Oct 2, 2006
- Messages
- 787
- Reaction score
- 103
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Nothing brings juicier picks via trade than a starting quarterback. Franchise him then trade him. We might get two first rounders if he continues to play well for the rest of the season.
It's debateable whether or not he's playing better than Brady did at this juncture in his STARTING career but Tom didn't have as many years in the system. One thing seems sure, he's as good or better than Palmer and Leinhart so they should find a willing team to trade if they tag him.
Let me play devil's advocate. Belichick has been known to ignore the
wishes of the fans. Suppose he knows that Cassel is the real thing.
What would the chances be that he might keep Cassel and make a
sweetheart deal for Brady? Three #1 choices and one #2 choice
from San Francisco like Chuck Fairbanks did in 1976. These
choices brought the Pats Pete Brock, Tim Fox, Ray Clayborn,
and Horace Ivory. Excuse me while I duck the mud pies.
Looking to 2009, Seymour, Wilfork, Mankins and plenty of others will be looking at final years of deals. While there may be some salary cap room, would you dump the reserve money to Cassel rather than signing some of the acknowledged great players on the roster to long-term deals?
Cassel will not replace Brady unless Brady shows he cannot recover from this surgery. Thus, you would be rolling the dice with the future of the team on the chance (1) another team is sufficiently interested to trade for him knowing his price just went way up from his present contract while at the same time indicating willingness to part with high draft picks or players or (2) that Brady does not return healthy and Cassel is immediately needed.
The effect of two players sitting on the roster chewing up that much cap space has huge implications on the ability of the Pats to sign or resign talent presently on the team or from free agency.
Cassel might agree to back up Brady for a couple of years (like Steve Young) if he was the heir apparent.
They can reach a long term agreement for less per year. Why would they ? Have you seen some of the QB this year and the monumental busts that half the top ten pick QB are ?Why would any team want to trade for a QB thats has that high of a salary if hes franchised. Especially one with only one year under his belt, I know hes playing well but you cant franchise him and expect someone to give up picks for the right to pay a one year QB that kind of money
Why would any team want to trade for a QB thats has that high of a salary if hes franchised. Especially one with only one year under his belt, I know hes playing well but you cant franchise him and expect someone to give up picks for the right to pay a one year QB that kind of money, and if no one trades for him we have two QB's taking up too much cap space and inhibits us from rounding out the team and providing depth.
Aint gonna happen, say thank you Matt for an exciting year and good luck with your future.
Why would any team want to trade for a QB thats has that high of a salary if hes franchised. Especially one with only one year under his belt, I know hes playing well but you cant franchise him and expect someone to give up picks for the right to pay a one year QB that kind of money, and if no one trades for him we have two QB's taking up too much cap space and inhibits us from rounding out the team and providing depth.
Aint gonna happen, say thank you Matt for an exciting year and good luck with your future.
They can reach a long term agreement for less per year. Why would they ? Have you seen some of the QB this year and the monumental busts that half the top ten pick QB are
this is more telling
Why would any team want to trade for a QB thats has that high of a salary if hes franchised. Especially one with only one year under his belt, I know hes playing well but you cant franchise him and expect someone to give up picks for the right to pay a one year QB that kind of money, and if no one trades for him we have two QB's taking up too much cap space and inhibits us from rounding out the team and providing depth.
Aint gonna happen, say thank you Matt for an exciting year and good luck with your future.
not sure if anyone explained this but if the pats tag him he doesn't get the money until he signs the tender, so the pats could legitimately shop him around and trade him in a sign and trade deal. pats get draft picks, cassel gets his money.
you can't let this guy walk away for nothing. if schaub gets a couple draft picks then cassel should get just as much.
the pick that you get from him could be our new cornerback or new passrusher or new o-line.
And almost certainly a #3 comp pick for Samuel.If we could get a nice pick or two for Cassel that would be awesome. We have our own 1st rounder, plus ours and SD's 2nd rounder.