AndyJohnson said:
What is your point then?
......
1) You disagree that the decisions should be made with only winning in mind or
2) You disagree with BBs decision making to carry out #1
Amazing twisting and turning and re-wording.
Whatever AJ.
I am simply not happy that AV and McGinest may not be part of the PATs
next year.
I do not think an offer to AV without guaranteed money is the way you say
thanks Adam ... and we still want you .... you're one of our most important
players.
It's like saying
1. AV you are still good enough that we want you.
2. We will pay you more than any other Kicker because you are worth it
and we have the CAP space to do it.
3. However, none of it is guaranteed money because we want to cut you
without penality if we so desire.
How is that gotcha, #3 above,
"a decision made with only winning in mind" ?
Perhaps it is and perhaps they should do it to all contracts .... no guaranteed
money for any player over 32. How's that for a philosophy carried to
an extreme?
Maybe BB/SP think AV and Willie have slipped and are on the decline.
If so then I am all wrong. But then why offer top dollar if that is the case?
Willie sure didn't seem to decline last year.