PatriotSeven
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 23, 2011
- Messages
- 2,906
- Reaction score
- 182
Assuming's Gronk's status of questionable this week, was -uhm - accurate, do we really want him to play knowing full well the extent of his injuries? Wouldn't that be a bit forced? Why not wait one more week?
I have a problem if once again it means we need Gronk healthy to get past a team like Atlanta, or advance in the playoffs. That means we haven't learned anything in 2 years.
We need to still be able to win big games without him. Other than Tom, I really don't like the idea of this team depending on one player this much. We need to get the job done confidently even if we miss a big player like Gronk.
I'm a bit worried about our depth if this is the case. Can't say I know too many teams that won Superbowls just because they had all their stars on the field.
I have a problem if once again it means we need Gronk healthy to get past a team like Atlanta, or advance in the playoffs. That means we haven't learned anything in 2 years.
We need to still be able to win big games without him. Other than Tom, I really don't like the idea of this team depending on one player this much. We need to get the job done confidently even if we miss a big player like Gronk.
I'm a bit worried about our depth if this is the case. Can't say I know too many teams that won Superbowls just because they had all their stars on the field.