SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.The holdout can kiss my *****, it's horrible OL play that's the problem.DillNisWillN28 said:Brady looks a little lost out there. This is playing right into Branch's hands. If I was his agent Id be making some calls to the Patriots front office first thing tomorrow morning. I hope to see Branch in uniform next week and Im sure Brady feels the same way.
mgteich said:We certainly can still win this game, but Childress, Brown and Caldwell are not enough. We could have them replaced by Branch, Gabriel and Jackson next week.
mgteich said:We certainly can still win this game, but Childress, Brown and Caldwell are not enough. We could have them replaced by Branch, Gabriel and Jackson next week.
mgteich said:The difference is not the OL line. We had exactly zero threats as outside receivers.
mgteich said:Not opening jitters.
We faced a really bad Buffalos secondary, and no one was getting open. We got by because of key Buffalo injuries during the game. But a win is a win, and hopefully we will have a stronger team next week.
mgteich said:The difference is not the OL line. We had exactly zero threats as outside wide receivers. Almost all passes were over the middle. We did have ONE outside threat: Faulk.
stcjones said:BB better have an answer for this....sending out a team of Brown, Childress and Caldwell as your starters IS NOT GOING TO CUT IT!!!!!
Wow, if it wasn't for your post I'd feel like I was alone against the world in this thread! I'm wondering which alien replaced mgtiech for him to say the O-line had nothing to do with the poor passing game, I could have sworn the Beefalo D-line had at least 4 passes defensed, at least as many hurries, two sacks/forced fumbles, plus another sack, nice to know Tommy would have done much better with a different WR corps...sheesh.desi-patsfan said:THe difference was VERY much the OL. In the first half Brady had all of 2 seconds to throw the ball. And when he did he had their D line in his face. In the 2nd half the Oline started blocking better and look at how well Brady did.
mgteich said:The difference is not the OL line. We had exactly zero threats as outside wide receivers. Almost all passes were over the middle. We did have ONE outside threat: Faulk.
Box_O_Rocks said:Wow, if it wasn't for your post I'd feel like I was alone against the world in this thread! I'm wondering which alien replaced mgtiech for him to say the O-line had nothing to do with the poor passing game, I could have sworn the Beefalo D-line had at least 4 passes defensed, at least as many hurries, two sacks/forced fumbles, plus another sack, nice to know Tommy would have done much better with a different WR corps...sheesh.