The roster transactions of the Cleveland Browns confirm Dane Brugler's scouting report.
Am I supposed to be impressed because the Browns cut him and that somehow backs up a scouting report?
I wonder what the scouting report claimed for Wes Welker in terms of weaknesses, and his slow 40 speed of 4.65? We all saw the poor scouting report from Tom Brady, so I'm not seeing the relationship to where a player was drafted or what specific team passed on him initially.
Yet, you chimed in with a smart arse response.
My "smart ass" response was stating that Belichick and Scarnecchia obviously see something in Braxton Cave enough to try and take a shot on him and/or develop something they see as a positive on some level.
As I said, he may be gone tomorrow morning, but obviously he isn't quite as bad as your daily tirades state, or he'd never even have made it to this level in the first place.
We have no idea what kind of positives he may have or they may try to develop. He's a 3 yr player who anchored the line at Notre Dame, so it's logical that he may have some cerebral skills and that they may try and develop his talent a bit. Whether or not that works out remains to be seen, but he's currently on a 53 man roster in the NFL.
Scarnecchia has done much more with much less. I think it's more than obvious you're jumping to conclusions based off of a very basic scouting report. Thankfully, our coaching staff and paid scouts go outside of the basics of CBS sports' scouting report.
The Cleveland Browns cut Braxston Cave only to turn around and sign UDFA Patrick Lewis.
I don't think any one of us cares in the least about what kind of roster moves the Cleveland Browns made after cutting Braxton Cave, most importantly Bill Belichick.
Are we supposed to somehow link a player's potential with what kind of roster moves were made after the team got rid of him? What the hell kind of jackass analysis would that be?
That's completely ridiculous....are you even hearing yourself?