JackBauer
Hall of Fame Poster
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2005
- Messages
- 25,365
- Reaction score
- 7,823
#1 - NO COACH likes a RBBC. Not Belichick. Not any other coach. Every coach wants a go-to guy. A RBBC only exists when there is no every down guy.
This is patently absurd for the following reasons:
1.) RBs have a very short shelf life. If you have a RBBC of capable backs, you spread the load amongst them and can keep some tire on their treads. Also, if you have a stable of backs with various skill sets, it allows for more diversity in the playbook and play calling.
2.) If your marquee RB gets injured, you're up a creek without a paddle. With a RBBC, individual injuries have a far less catastrophic effect on the offense.
#2 - I cannot disagree more. He is a 1st round pick who has had a chance to be the big dog in a high-powered offense on a winning team, and yet, he has never distinguished himself. I have long held the contention that he could be groomed to replace Kevin Faulk as the 3rd down/change of pace guy, but he is not a #1 on a top team.
Either/or fallacy.
2007 NFL Draft - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
A simple glance at the first round should show you that Laurence Maroney is not a bust.
#3 - I find myself watching old NFL films of Corey Dillon and Antowain Smith.
Antowain Smith!
What does THAT tell you?
Antowain was nothing more than average, and Maroney probably has greater natural gifts than Smith had, but at least Antowain made his mark in a strong offense on a good team.
And Dillon was everything as advertised and more.
You're a hard core Pats fan. YOU HAVE TO MISS HAVING A STUD RB! Don't you?
Not really. It's a passing league now. Frankly I'd rather have three or four capable backs than one stud.
Look at the reigning Super Bowl champions: Mike Bell, Pierre Thomas, Reggie Bush.