SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.So basically the meeting was a waste of complete time.
Good job Sphincter.
Goodell also said he has not heard from Matt Walsh, the former Patriots employee who performed some videotaping duties for the team. Goodell said he has offered Walsh a deal whereby "he has to tell the truth and he has to return anything he took improperly."
This doesn't sound like a good deal for Walsh. What did Goodell offer in return for the truth and the tapes? Walsh has made it clear that he wants his legal fees paid for before he releases anything, so I guess they didn't offer that.
the senator was on TV claiming their were notes from 04 steelers games and stuff.
i hope this does not end with pats going down in the looney bins.
OH MY GOD....THEY HAD NOTES???? NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT NOTES!
what honest team would have notes about another team, that's just low man...low
OH MY GOD....THEY HAD NOTES???? NO ONE SAID ANYTHING ABOUT NOTES!
what honest team would have notes about another team, that's just low man...low
I have no idea what he wants to see , some one should put the tape that got out in a loop for 30 hrs .it was boring to watch for 2 minutes that will clear his head.
looney bins is an old expression ... i am old.
I've seen some reports that Goodell told Specter the Pats had taped Steelers regular season game and AFCCG a few years back. Also, Goodell said in September that the taping only went back to 2006, but now they are saying it went back to 2002 and 2000. Goodell is looking like a liar right now.
It looks like it's only going to get much, much worse for our Pats.
Goodell said that Belichick, New England’s coach since 2000, told him that he believed the taping was legal, implying that he’s been doing it since he has been the head coach. Goodell said he did not concur.
"He said that’s always been his interpretation since he’s been the head coach," the commissioner said. "We are going to agree to disagree on the facts."
I've seen some reports that Goodell told Specter the Pats had taped Steelers regular season game and AFCCG a few years back. Also, Goodell said in September that the taping only went back to 2006, but now they are saying it went back to 2002 and 2000. Goodell is looking like a liar right now.
It looks like it's only going to get much, much worse for our Pats.
Goodell also said he has not heard from Matt Walsh, the former Patriots employee who performed some videotaping duties for the team. Goodell said he has offered Walsh a deal whereby "he has to tell the truth and he has to return anything he took improperly."
This doesn't sound like a good deal for Walsh. What did Goodell offer in return for the truth and the tapes? Walsh has made it clear that he wants his legal fees paid for before he releases anything, so I guess they didn't offer that.
Well, he was offered immunity to talk. So yeah.
I've seen some reports that Goodell told Specter the Pats had taped Steelers regular season game and AFCCG a few years back. Also, Goodell said in September that the taping only went back to 2006, but now they are saying it went back to 2002 and 2000. Goodell is looking like a liar right now.
It looks like it's only going to get much, much worse for our Pats.
Goodell offered him to never have legal bills for anyone to pick up. What he didn't offer Walsh is hundreds of thousands of dollars to let him cash in for his BS information which really seems to be what he wanted in the first place.
I said legal fees, not immunity.