cupofjoe1962
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Feb 4, 2008
- Messages
- 5,570
- Reaction score
- 3,456
Convenient that, pardon my cynicism at the coincidence but it's obvious you are following the thread and it's interesting that you only responded after being called out on it.
Do you really believe those everybody gets in NHL de riguer Bruins playoff trips that fans knew were doomed to failure made the Bruins 'popular' and are the reason Jacobs was able to milk Bruins fans rather than their loyalty? Or are you really just that desperate to cling to an indefensible point? Because in the past 20 years they failed to make the playoffs 8 times and the faithful were still there. That most Bruins and Sox fans are/were loyal doesn't obviate that Celts fans aren't but it does blow a hole in the argument that Boston fans only support winners. It's fair to say that the jury is out on today's win spoiled Pats fans but you can not realistically say it about Boston fans as a whole
As someone that sat through those seasons that was a surprising mistake for you to make but at least you acknowledged it. I personally prized both of those wins, I certainly would never forget one of them.
Now it is my turn to admit a 'mistake' of sorts. I never saw what you were responding to, I have that individual's posts set to ignore.
Here:
You posited the Celtics after the Big 3 and the Patriots of the 80’s & early 90’s as proof of your premise the region will not support a team in decline. Yet for almost 4 decades after the Orr era the Bruins progressively declined to the point of treading water and yet continued to enjoy support disproportionate to their meager success, not to mention the Sox. The point being Boston in it's heart of hearts has long been a hockey and baseball town. It has never really been a true basketball town. The Celts have had periods of popularity but have never come close to attaining the substantial core of die hard loyal fans enjoyed by the B's & Sox, as a result they need to win to draw. Until the Belichick/Brady era the Pats never enjoyed more than spurts of popularity. They too needed to win to draw, the NFL itself was not ingrained into the regions sports DNA. The past 20+ years may or may not have changed that but to dismiss the possibility it has based on the example of the Celtics while ignoring the examples of the B's & Sox is making a very poor case indeed.
One last thought on that subject. By staying away in droves fans actually prompt owners to field a winner. In that respect Bruins & Sox fans that wanted a winner did themselves no favors for a lot of years. I know I struggled with myself over continuing to support Kiam's version of our team but I am a Pats fan and in the end that won out. I do have to admit I am not sure it would have continued to had his ownership lasted longer than it did.
True.... I responded when you pointed out that I had not responded. I had many people responding to my posts, & I don’t use I check list to make sure I respond to everyone.
Your post was quite long & I bypassed responding to it, to respond to the shorter posts.
Who could blame you for having AJ on ignore.
I should do the same. It would be addition by subtraction.
As far as the Bruins & Redsox go..... I don’t watch hockey or baseball. I liked them both as a kid, but I lost interest in hockey around 1990 & baseball about 10 years ago.
I stand by my original statement that the season ticket waiting list will disappear & the Patriots will have a problem selling out some (only a few) games if they have a couple poor seasons.
Now you are entitled to your opinion, but the history of the Patriots has shown that the Patriots fans have not shown up at the gate to support a bad team.
The same could be said for the Celtics & even the Redsox of the 1960’s. The Bruins fans may be the exception.
Last edited: