eom
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,064
- Reaction score
- 1,487
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.what an ******* --- why do you guys listen to this dude?
On top of his idiocy Tanguay is a terrible interviewer. I actually cringe and feel bad for how awkward the interviewees must feel.Who cares? Tanguay will ruin the interview anyway. After listening to Tanguay try to school Michael McCann about the law yesterday, I have no hope of there ever being a decent interview on WEEI with him on.
I don't need to listen to know Tanguay argued with Florio that the Krafts did apologize to Mort and it was Belichick's fault that Brady got the punishment he did because Belichick was the first person to mention Brady's name.
Dennis and Callahan @DandCShow 34m34 minutes ago
Mike Florio just said that he requested the actual PSI numbers from the AFC Title game from the NFL on Super Bowl Sunday and was denied.
Who cares? Tanguay will ruin the interview anyway. After listening to Tanguay try to school Michael McCann about the law yesterday, I have no hope of there ever being a decent interview on WEEI with him on.
He challenged McCann again? He did it a month ago too. It was aggravating listening to a clown with absolutely no background at all in law trying to argue with a lawyer who was brought on the show specifically to enlighten the listeners on the legal process.
It's sad that WEEI apparently feels that they need to bring in their own contrarians in order to compete with the two contrarians on the Sports Hub's afternoon show
On top of his idiocy Tanguay is a terrible interviewer. I actually cringe and feel bad for how awkward the interviewees must feel.
I almost never listen but I vaguely remember how in 2007, D&C would whine like babies about the Patriots running up the score and try to pepper Brady about it during their Monday interview.D&C ARE contrarians. they always have been and they are just as much garbage as tanguay. I remember when i was living in an area that got WEEI, driving to work i'd try and listen to d&c in the morning and it was awful.
Will you please stop with this? Stop asking perfectly logical questions that deserve real, truthful answers. Much more important to make assumptions to try and justify $5M being spent then lie the whole way to try and not make yourself look bad. And fail at that.Florio indeed made the point that he requested the actual numbers from the NFL for the Super Bowl pregame show, but the NFL wouldn't give them in order to keep the Patriots in the dark.
Now that raises an interesting point. Hold onto that thought while I reintroduce something we've all talked about ad nauseous. Namely, that the NFL knew about the rumblings that the Patriots tamper with footballs, but:
(1) Didn't talk to the Patriots about it before the AFCCG and say, look, no funny stuff, and
(2) When they discovered McNally and the footballs were missing (and Anderson was "distraught"), still used those footballs instead of immediately removing them for retesting, and using the backup balls.
If the NFL is so concerned about the "integrity of the game", why weren't they concerned about *GETTING THESE THINGS RIGHT*? Why would they let the Patriots play the first half of the AFCCG with footballs that they had reason to believe might have been tampered with? And why would they let the Patriots swing in the wind leading up to the Super Bowl, which would have given the Seahawks an advantage, at least in terms of time and energy spent on game prep?
These things speak directly to the "integrity of the game", and in both cases the NFL chose courses of action that clearly went against it.
I want to know if Walt Anderson was significantly distraught and/or did he lose two pounds because he could not eat?Florio indeed made the point that he requested the actual numbers from the NFL for the Super Bowl pregame show, but the NFL wouldn't give them in order to keep the Patriots in the dark.
Now that raises an interesting point. Hold onto that thought while I reintroduce something we've all talked about ad nauseous. Namely, that the NFL knew about the rumblings that the Patriots tamper with footballs, but:
(1) Didn't talk to the Patriots about it before the AFCCG and say, look, no funny stuff, and
(2) When they discovered McNally and the footballs were missing (and Anderson was "distraught"), still used those footballs instead of immediately removing them for retesting, and using the backup balls.
If the NFL is so concerned about the "integrity of the game", why weren't they concerned about *GETTING THESE THINGS RIGHT*? Why would they let the Patriots play the first half of the AFCCG with footballs that they had reason to believe might have been tampered with? And why would they let the Patriots swing in the wind leading up to the Super Bowl, which would have given the Seahawks an advantage, at least in terms of time and energy spent on game prep?
These things speak directly to the "integrity of the game", and in both cases the NFL chose courses of action that clearly went against it.
Florio indeed made the point that he requested the actual numbers from the NFL for the Super Bowl pregame show, but the NFL wouldn't give them in order to keep the Patriots in the dark.
Now that raises an interesting point. Hold onto that thought while I reintroduce something we've all talked about ad nauseous. Namely, that the NFL knew about the rumblings that the Patriots tamper with footballs, but:
(1) Didn't talk to the Patriots about it before the AFCCG and say, look, no funny stuff, and
(2) When they discovered McNally and the footballs were missing (and Anderson was "distraught"), still used those footballs instead of immediately removing them for retesting, and using the backup balls.
If the NFL is so concerned about the "integrity of the game", why weren't they concerned about *GETTING THESE THINGS RIGHT*? Why would they let the Patriots play the first half of the AFCCG with footballs that they had reason to believe might have been tampered with? And why would they let the Patriots swing in the wind leading up to the Super Bowl, which would have given the Seahawks an advantage, at least in terms of time and energy spent on game prep?
These things speak directly to the "integrity of the game", and in both cases the NFL chose courses of action that clearly went against it.
I almost never listen but I vaguely remember how in 2007, D&C would whine like babies about the Patriots running up the score and try to pepper Brady about it during their Monday interview.