Keegs
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Apr 11, 2006
- Messages
- 4,942
- Reaction score
- 12
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Keegs said:In case anyone was wondering, the answer to this question is a "no".
You're probably the only one.Keegs said:i thought it was hilarious
the only one that matters.BelichickFan said:You're probably the only one.
T-ShirtDynasty said:.....Who??
I'm thinking we need to ask Ian to Sticky one of these threads... cause I keep forgetting about that guy damnit.PATSNUTme said:Make you yearn for those OT theads, doesn't it? This will be the first of 20 in the next 5 weeks.
Enjoy, everyone
yes sir!mcdonut16 said:What a waste of space, and a waste of a mouse click.
Don't waste our time with this nonsense !
THEARCHIVES said:please stop writing posts about Ty Law, please! Enough already! When he signs then you can post all you want...
patsfan13 said:We venture into the Dead Zone of the footbll year, anybody see my golf clubs?
How long till TC starts?
John (Emporia, KS): KC, according to your calculations, will the Chiefs be legit contenders if they do infact sign Ty Law? GO CHIEFS!
K.C. Joyner: Ty Law is a good player but from a coverage point he wouldn't put the Chiefs over the top. Law's modified yards per attempt was 4.4, which puts him in the middle of the league. He did get a lot of interceptions, something the Chiefs could use, but I don't know that he will necessarily match last year's int total. He would be an improvement over their current roster, but I think their defensive problems have been coaching related as much as anything. Maybe Edwards can clear that up.