SONS_OF_BELICHICK
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 858
- Reaction score
- 188
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Tampa?
Apparently Schiano isn't sold on Freeman and they have a decent amount of picks (1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 5, 6, 7). If they can do a deal to get the 2nd rounder and both 4th round picks that would be a good deal for both teams.
I was thinking that ....teams are going to go after QB's at the end of the first or early part of the 2nd. Who would be the best trade partner for us?
I am not sure if Buffalo would do it....but we all know BB likes to trade back to get some good picks .....especially in a deep draft
Agree with Tampa give us back that 4th we traded for Talib
I'd prefer their 4th
To make the trade equitable (trade value table), the Patriots would
need to get Tampa's 2nd round pick, Tampa's 4th round pick, and
something else.
Last year, Belichick got short-changed in his deals to trade down.
Luckily, they got Dennard with one of the picks they obtained.
I was thinking that ....teams are going to go after QB's at the end of the first or early part of the 2nd. Who would be the best trade partner for us?
I am not sure if Buffalo would do it....but we all know BB likes to trade back to get some good picks .....especially in a deep draft
Buffalo would seem to be a good possibility, if Nassib is still on the board. BB and Marrone are reportedly friendly. Agree with Tampa as well.
I don't think that anyone but Buffalo has Nassib rated highly. Most think that Buffalo will draft him with their 2nd rounder.
I don't think that anyone but Buffalo has Nassib rated highly. Most think that Buffalo will draft him with their 2nd rounder.
IMO we should keep 29.
We should, but we dont have enough picks. We only have 4 picks if we get Sanders. I think we should trade down to acquire more picks. I also think that with what we have at this point with our roster, we will need depth at positions and possible starters in case we have a ton of injuries. I think we should draft a CB, WR, DE, S, OT, and OG.
There was no reduction in picks. Sanders counts as a pick. Just like Moss and Welker did. What mystical force makes a pick used to acquire a vet not a pick???
I do agree that if feasible, trading down in a deep draft could be a good move given our needs as you described.
I think our best trade partners are teams in the top 12 that have CB/DT needs but are drafting too high to take certain prospects are likely to trade back into the end of the 1st to get someone at those positions. The other reason I say top 12 teams is that most of those teams have brand new head coaches and what better way to create some excitement and play politics than drafting top 12 and then again at the end of the 1st?
Chargers, Eagles, Jaguars and Browns come to mind mostly.
We should, but we dont have enough picks. We only have 4 picks if we get Sanders. I think we should trade down to acquire more picks. I also think that with what we have at this point with our roster, we will need depth at positions and possible starters in case we have a ton of injuries. I think we should draft a CB, WR, DE, S, OT, and OG.