SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Before anyone takes me seriously and freaks out, I should probably clarify that that was pure sarcasm. Given the problems that some people seem to have with Belichick, morbid curiosity is the only thing that'd keep me around if those same people were subjected to Marty.
9-7 is a decent record, would be crazy to fire him after that
I <3 Von Miller tho.
What's occurring now with this team (rebuilding) is a natural part of the NFL cycle that has little to do with coaching. The fact that BB and his staff have managed to log double-digit wins the last two seasons is testament to superior coaching with subpar talent. Given reasonable player health and a good 2011 draft, I would expect the Patriots to seriously content again in 2012 (assuming no lockout in 2011). This is a "bottoming out" season on the downward curve from the 2001-2004 peak and whatever success is enjoyed this year is gravy. BB is the primary reason this team hasn't had a losing season since 2000.
I'm not basing this on one loss, nor am I saying it should happen. I'm just saying I can realistically see this team losing 6-7 more games this season, and if that happens and the Pats miss the playoffs, does that warrant the discussion?
What's occurring now with this team (rebuilding) is a natural part of the NFL cycle that has little to do with coaching. The fact that BB and his staff have managed to log double-digit wins the last two seasons is testament to superior coaching with subpar talent. Given reasonable player health and a good 2011 draft, I would expect the Patriots to seriously content again in 2012 (assuming no lockout in 2011). This is a "bottoming out" season on the downward curve from the 2001-2004 peak and whatever success is enjoyed this year is gravy. BB is the primary reason this team hasn't had a losing season since 2000.
I tend to look back at the previous dynasty, the Cowboys.
Shula coached until he was 65, Landry until he was 64, Noll until he was 59.
All three spent their post-dynasty years bouncing around near 0.500, with an occasional stinker of a season and an occasional season of double-digit wins. In other words, after their respective dynasties ended, they were still pretty competent coaches until they retired. I expect Belichick to end up the same way.
I understand BB is one of the best coaches of all time, and he is a major reason the Pats have won three Superbowls, but every coach's time runs out. Based on the remaining schedule, I can realistically see 6-7 more losses this season. What happens if the Pats finish 9-7 or 8-8 and miss the playoffs? Does a new coaching staff even warrant discussion amongst ownership? This is his 11th year which far exceeds avg coaching stints in the NFL, but is it possible his offensive and defensive philosophies have become too predictable?
I know I am not an NFL coach, scout or any type of professional analyst whatsoever, but it does seem there has not been much diversity on offense or defense. Short pass of some type on 1st down, run for nothing on 2nd down and lob it down field on 3rd and long. It seems like this sequence of plays seems to happen too often.
I know in BB's defense the DL's job is to occupy blockers and let LBs get to the ball. It just doesn't seem this group of guys is suited for that style of D. It seems like the Pats personnel is better suited to shooting gaps and penetrating vs. hold and react. I guess I would just like to see some diversity in our game plans instead of trying to incorporate the same strategies we've always used with players that may not be suited for that style.
Vincent Jackson, Patrick Peterson and Von Miller 2011!!!!
Shula coached until he was 65, Landry until he was 64, Noll until he was 59.
All three spent their post-dynasty years bouncing around near 0.500, with an occasional stinker of a season and an occasional season of double-digit wins. In other words, after their respective dynasties ended, they were still pretty competent coaches until they retired. I expect Belichick to end up the same way.
like your avatarOff The Grid approves of this statement.
BB is 59 now though isn't he? Wonder in all reality how many "coaching years" he has left. Maybe 5-6.....Will be a sad f'in day around NE when BB hangs up the hoodie and the whistle.....