Welcome to PatsFans.com

Bam Childress starts at WR

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by D-cleater, Aug 19, 2006.

  1. D-cleater

    D-cleater Rookie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Prediction: 3 quarters, 5 catches for 70 yds.

    Obviously makes the starting 5 for Week One
  2. D-cleater

    D-cleater Rookie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    So, my prediction may have been a little conservative. I am not sure whether I am happier to see him or Tully BC making some plays. whoo hoooo!!!
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2006
  3. PatsFanInVa

    PatsFanInVa PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2006
    Messages:
    20,106
    Likes Received:
    216
    Ratings:
    +326 / 6 / -8

    Looks like a lot of dividends coming in tonight so far... of course, it IS pre-season, and it IS against the cardinals... but I'm diggin this!
  4. Ceresco

    Ceresco Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2005
    Messages:
    590
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    He's looking pretty damn good.
  5. patsfan55

    patsfan55 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    2,673
    Likes Received:
    4
    Ratings:
    +4 / 0 / -0

    #95 Jersey

    i really hope bam bam makes the roster
    however musinski looks pretty good
    and kight keeps starting
  6. njpatsfan

    njpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    And led the team in receiving yards 3 rec 75 yards ....

    R
  7. arrellbee

    arrellbee Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    Just as idle speculation, looks like Childress has the inside track on the 5th WR slot. As a wild guess, maybe Musinski versu Kight for a 6th slot if they carry 6. Neither of those guys is PS eligible.
  8. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    I thought Musinski had another year?
    Last edited by a moderator: Nov 29, 2005
  9. arrellbee

    arrellbee Rookie

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    He was an undrafted rookie in 04, so I think that means after two years he isn't eligible. I could certainly be wrong, but that's my take.
  10. D-cleater

    D-cleater Rookie

    Joined:
    May 1, 2006
    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Assuming we dont pick up a proven receiver in the next few weeks, I think (hope) he's a lock for the 5th spot, maybe the fourth spot if Branch holds out into the season.

    More idle speculation, but suppose C Jackson starts the season on PUP, Branch holds out. Childress could concievably be our 3rd receiver.

    IIR , didn't he even play a little on D last year?
  11. njpatsfan

    njpatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    816
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    He's already showed more than Bethel did in three years.

    R
  12. jaychamp

    jaychamp Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2006
    Messages:
    459
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    IF Chad comes back, and has a nice showing in preseason, it's going to take all the leverage away from Branch. He's already lost some but that would be a huge blow.

    Chad, Reche, Brown, Childress doesn't look that bad to me right now.
  13. Box_O_Rocks

    Box_O_Rocks PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2005
    Messages:
    20,550
    Likes Received:
    25
    Ratings:
    +25 / 0 / -0

    Two years on the Practice Squad is the limit, but that presumes he was on a Practice Squad in 04...

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>