- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
And you are such a HOMER that you would rather not respect the other team or the athletic competition?
I'm not a homer at all. I don't think homer is even the word you wanted to use here.
Knowing the results in advance, would you rather watch a 24-21 win or a 59-0 blowout? According to you the blowout right?
Neither. If I already know the precise outcome, I have no interest in watching the game. At that point, the only thing I'd be doing was breaking down the game, which is not the same thing in my book.
What do you learn about your team in a blowout??
Some things you can learn in a blowout: Who is driven enough to keep competing? How good are the replacements doing? How does the team look in specific situations with mixed personnel?
Dont you learn more about your team in a tight, hard-fought win?? There are different schools of thought for sure.
In my experience, it's more that you're learning some different things.
Parcells liked building the team, Belichick would rather coach the game. That doesnt mean Parcells didnt coach and BB didnt build, right? This team isnt even built yet, they havent won a game. You dont know who is going to make the team and you certainly dont know much about the team(s)we will be playing.
This is completely irrelevant to the point you were trying to make.
What makes sports and football in particular a fantastic specatator sport is that it is the ultimate reality show. The players, the characters change and the landscape evolves each week. Last years heavy favorites are this years Cinderellas, etc. To watch every game with the idea of beating the opponent as badly as possible is to simply not enjoy sport.
You are welcome to your opinion. I'll keep mine. When I began playing sports, I was at an age that was so young I needed waivers just to get into the youngest levels. From day one, I always wanted to win. From day one, I wanted to crush the opponents in any organized/league situation. That drove me to improve, especially if I lost. I keep that same approach when watching. If you can win by 7, try to win by 14. There eventually comes a point where you can pull back, but that's only when the opponent is clearly finished and has surrendered, or when impossibility of victory has made the opponent's efforts more humorous than challenging. Belichick takes the same approach. It's one of the things I respect about him, although it's a fine line and sometimes I'll probably rail about him running it up now and again, because the point where keeping it going becomes running it up is really an individually assessed moment.
The best game I ever went to was the 02 Finale when we came back from 10 points down with 2 minutes left to win in OT. The JEST won and we didnt make the playoffs but that doesnt discount the QUALITY of the game regardless of playoff outcome.
I thoroughly enjoyed 45-3 last year. I sure as hell enjoyed it a lot more than I enjoyed the sequel.
We've seen it play out, time and again. People love watching Goliath. We saw that with Tyson. We saw that with the ratings the Patriots got in 2007. Whether it's people hoping to see a David step up, or it's people wanting to see Goliath crush his opponents, a Goliath is a huge draw in sporting contests.
Your seeming disdain for games that can become blowouts seems out of place in the world of professional sports, where even the best teams can get their hats handed to them if they don't show up to play a given game. Perhaps you should be focusing your time on a kiddie league in your area where they don't keep score and don't have winners and losers.
Last edited: