- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 55,473
- Reaction score
- 26,471
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Truth. We're also going to watch Revis more and appreciate him better.
Just what we need. More "analysis" by the "experts" around here.
Or see how ridiculously much holding he gets away with. Probably both.
I still don't understand what the big fear is here. These are professional athletes and coaches who get paid the big bucks to do what they do. If they can't brush off criticism from ignorant fans, they probably shouldn't be in the NFL.Guys like Mike Lombardi and Matt Bowen among others have been writing for the last week or so about the pitfalls of many fans belief that the All 22 will finally give them the means to legitimately critique plays and players. It takes a while, sometimes a couple of years for guys at their level to grasp what they are seeing on that film to the point they can truly break it down. And even then their breakdowns remain limited because they don't know the play call or the assignments or the adjustments. Their critique is based on who appeared to do what absent information about who was supposed to do what. And hereabouts, in the land of the complex offense and multiple (and disguised) defensive schemes that information will remain about as valid as what we've always had...
This all 22 is going to kill this board after losses people are going to rip every tiny detail and it's going to make this place hell
I always (foolishly, I know) thought that HDTV with its better resolution and wider screen aspect would show more of the DBs.
Instead, the camera still shows 5-8 yards behind the QB of nothingness instead of shifting the coverage downfield.
The all all-22 footage will elevate the quality of the discourse here.
Exactly!!
22 Tape isn't going to create the Monday Morning QuarterBack.
That subspecies goes back thousands of years, Gentlemen, well before the invention of FootBall.
We Students of the Game will gain much...while continuing to ignore the Bleaters.
4. I have to admit I am a bit surprised by the lack of enthusiasm for this idea, flawed though it be. I would have thought there would be many here who would have flocked to the idea, especially people who could have improved on the concept. I can only conclude that the great majority here would rather make their "judgments" in the dark, or prefer to "play" alone. Well never mind I guess. It was just a thought
Let me make a few things clear about this proposal:
1. The object was to provide a more detailed and more definitive assessment of Pats games than we've had before for the greater enjoyment of the fans of this board. Definitive simply because we'd have more information than before.
2. OF COURSE this would be simply an amateur's offerings, since we still wouldn't know critical data like the play called and the LOS adjustments on both sides of the ball. THAT'S NOT THE POINT - The point was to provide something better than we've had in the past
3. What I found most ironic was the criticism that as just fans we aren't qualified to make judgments on the success or failure of player on a particular play. Isn't THAT what we do here on a daily basis? Isn't that the PURPOSE of this board in the first place? The only difference is that NOW we'd make those speculative judgments with more information. It goes without saying that anything we put together would be amateur "uninformed" judgments, but they'd be LESS uninformed than before!
4. I have to admit I am a bit surprised by the lack of enthusiasm for this idea, flawed though it be. I would have thought there would be many here who would have flocked to the idea, especially people who could have improved on the concept. I can only conclude that the great majority here would rather make their "judgments" in the dark, or prefer to "play" alone. Well never mind I guess. It was just a thought
I would not let the 'lack of enthusiasm' deter you for one moment. That's probably due primarily to our being in the deadest part of the NFL year, post-draft and pre-training camp.
As someone else said earlier most of us already have a good idea who is capable of intelligent objective analysis worth reading and whose is not - and for those that don't already know that, it will become immediately apparent after just a very few games.
I am very much looking forward to the reviews from several of the forum members here, and would highly encourage any of you that wish to participate to do so. Personally I think I will review the games, keep most of my thoughts to myself, and compare what I saw to what others see - at least initially while I try and get a better grasp of an entire game from the all-22 angle.
Let me second the recommendation that we less knowledgeable fans read "Take Your Eye Off The Ball" by Pat Kirwan. Reading the section on all the pass pattern permutations I felt like Ocho on the LOS pre-snap.
And Ken, this IS the football doldrums time. Enthusiasm will build. Even I a shall we say "thrifty" Scot will buy the All 22 even to just check it out. Don't know if I will devote the study needed to become a reviewer worth opining but on second thought, that's never stopped me previously
That, pretty much. I bought it, but I don't trust my ability to analyze what I'm seeing to the point that I would be comfortable drawing conclusions from it, let alone making those conclusions part of some compendium of work. Maybe in a few years when I'm more familiar/confident in the whole process.
To me, the most interesting thing about this view would be what disguises opposing defenses give Brady, and the pre-snap adjustments that he makes accordingly. That's what I would watch for. Alas, when I was a student, I had the time to do this and break it down for myself but probably couldn't see spending the money on it. Now that I work full time, I could see spending the money on it but wouldn't have the time. Such is life.