- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,355
- Reaction score
- 105,349
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I love Tom Sr. He totally went Al Pacino in Scent of a Woman...."What a crock of s__t!"
What you are missing is that this will be put forth as an integrity of the game. Rice was personal. This is about "integrity". That's the catchall. How can the NFLPA defend that? So they are supporting cheating? See where I'm going with this?
No I don't. Because the NFLPA doesn't give a flying **** what the suspension is about. The NFLPA argues on behalf of players based on the strength of the case.
What is so hard about this? Why do you think that the NFLPA is going to change everything it's done for it's entire history just for this one case that involved Tom Brady? It's really is mind boggling.
It is. A few non Pats fans see it that way. The majority don't. They believe what they see on NFLN and ESPN. I've been at it all day. The tides will not change. 4 Super Bowls due to cheating. That's the legacy like it or not which I hate because it's not true. Never seen anything like it.
The public wants blood. Other teams want blood too.
It's pretty ridiculous. It doesn't really matter that 3 of those were won before the 2006 rule change, or that nobody is measuring Manning's balls who helped change the rule. Now it's Brady's rule...
I wish Kraft would come out and accuse the Colts of deflating balls since some of theirs were also under regulation. He should come out forcefully and use the same terminology more probable than not. He should also point out that Brady played BETTER after they reinflated the balls, and if there was an advantage to the lower PSI balls, it certainly wasn't for us in the first half.
But it won't matter. ESPN and the rest of the ****ty sports media is going to feast on this without anyone there actually reading the entire report, just finding bits and snippets for maximum ratings.
You don't deserve blood just because some lawyer offers an opinion that there's a 50.1% chance that somebody did something wrong and a 49.9% chance that somebody did not.
Y'know......as stupid as this sounds, part of me wants Bob to step down. He doesn't want to fight this war. I believe its a war worth fighting.
I was ok with his statement right up until the last paragraph. It made everything before that diluted in its tone and message. He totally wimped out.
Jonathan would fight. I am convinced of this.
Given Kraft's statement regarding accepting punishment, he likely already knows the penalty IMO. You don't defer before judgement day....but he did. Hmmmmmm
YES! Bob completely backed down and bent over from his DEMAND that ABSENT CONCLUSIVE PROOF, the league owes the Patriots an apology. Why not fight it?I don't understand the last paragraph either. I mean, f it. What happens if they say no, we don;t accept this report or your punishment. What would happen, really? Why not fight and find out?
It's pretty ridiculous. It doesn't really matter that 3 of those were won before the 2006 rule change, or that nobody is measuring Manning's balls who helped change the rule. Now it's Brady's rule...
I wish Kraft would come out and accuse the Colts of deflating balls since some of theirs were also under regulation. He should come out forcefully and use the same terminology more probable than not. He should also point out that Brady played BETTER after they reinflated the balls, and if there was an advantage to the lower PSI balls, it certainly wasn't for us in the first half.
But it won't matter. ESPN and the rest of the ****ty sports media is going to feast on this without anyone there actually reading the entire report, just finding bits and snippets for maximum ratings.
It is. A few non Pats fans see it that way. The majority don't. They believe what they see on NFLN and ESPN. I've been at it all day. The tides will not change. 4 Super Bowls due to cheating. That's the legacy like it or not which I hate because it's not true. Never seen anything like it.
The tide changed once before.
The Boston media would be a start. How they go straight for the preceived negative stuff baffles me. Are we in NE or Indy? Well I'm in AZ, but you get my point.
Here are my thoughts:
- The real tragedy here is that Tom Brady's legacy will be tarnished over something so stupid
Absolutely agree. If the Pats don't fight now there will be nothing left to fight for in the future.
The NFL has declared war on the Pats, and I don't feel confident that Bob Kraft is the general our army needs leading them in this battle.
Step aside Bob, it was coming sooner rather than later anyway, hand the reigns to Jonathan now.
Tanguay and Shaughnessy already have their fangs into this.The Boston media would be a start. How they go straight for the preceived negative stuff baffles me. Are we in NE or Indy? Well I'm in AZ, but you get my point.