We didn't get a tall WR in FA or the draft? Why?

RobertWeathers · May 5, 2015

supafly said:
Actually, it's quite the opposite, which is actually why it's funny. Someone that dedicated to defending the idea of it being a "nice piece to have" (your very innocent wording) seems just as over the top, yet on the other side of the spectrum.

I get it now. My god. All I implied was that a tall possession receiver on the outside was a nice to have b/c the team is loaded with a ton of weapons and I get a "dislike". To be taken that way is hysterical.

Funny how this board works sometimes.

fester · May 6, 2015

scott99 said:
Two of the DEEPEST WR drafts we may ever see. Just in the 5th round alone, there were way better talents/value picks at WR than we will ever see than a deep snapper that might night play for two years. Same goes for the 2014 draft, picking guard Halopia (spelling) over some receivers who produced and have excellent talent.

Can you name two recievers picked in the mid-6th or 7th that look to be 50+ catch guys this year?

Name names please

We didn't get a tall WR in FA or the draft? Why?

RobertWeathers

Member of the Seattle 7 & Roadie for Metallica

fester

Third String But Playing on Special Teams

Similar threads