- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 15,530
- Reaction score
- 27,554
This is an interesting observation that probably should be explored further. It's one that I haven't thought about. I think most of us have forgotten that BOB was the real architect of the initial 2 TE offense.I don't think McDaniels really knows how to use the 2-TE offense nearly as effectively as Bill O'Brien did. He split Wright out wide way too much. The really glory years of Gronk-AHern were under O'Brien in 2010-2011. In 2012 injuries kept them from being on the field together for more than 3 full games (games 1, 6 and 7), and then the roof fell in. He needs to learn how to use Wright, who has the potential to be a major asset.
Probably needs its own thread since the Josh McDaniel haters are going to want to go to town on this. , especially after such a choppy offensive effort last night. I'm certainly NOT a hater, but one could really criticize a lot of his red zone choices last night, though we will never know how many of those plays were eventually called by Brady on the LOS
Not the first time it's happened - he threw up the terrible interception at the end of the 1st half against Detroit, another underthrown ball with Gronk wide open in the end zone. In both cases Brady was under some pressure - more in the Detroit situation - and threw with his weight falling backwards. Leaving points off the board when in the red zone at the end of a half is a major no-no, and for Brady to do it twice in 3 games is pretty inexcusable. It's got to stop.
Brady's not perfect. He never has been. What we forget is that most of the time he's simply LESS imperfect than all of his contemporaries. They ALL throw some really inexplicable passes sometimes, even Manning and Rodgers. I'm sure we will see that number increasing as Brady enters his dotage. But that being said, for the next 3 or 4 years there STILL won't be more than a handful of QB who will be better than him, and as long as he's here, he will be good enough to QB this team to a superbowl. Maybe not "carry" a team to a championship, but good enough to lead one there.
Lets remember that the elite Tom Brady has never won a superbowl.
Browner has had almost as big an impact as Revis, IMO. That's his game - get physical. And it's exactly what the Pats need. A lot of the penalties have been ticky-tack stuff, but some of it is just the price for playing his type of game. The Pats have been 8-1 since he game off suspension, and with the exception of the Green Bay game they have basically beaten the crap out of every top receiving combo they have faced (Green-Sanu-Gresham, Marshal-Jeffery-Bennett-Forte, DThomas-Sanders-JThomas-Welker, Hilton-Wayne-Nicks-Fleener, Johnson-Tate-Pettigrew-Ebron and now Allen-Floyd-Royal-Gates). And if Kyle Arrington had been healthy against GB then I think Browner would have made Devante Adams his ***** by the end of the game.
Browner's coverage has been very, very good. The Malcolm Floyd TD catch and 28 yard reception were just great plays made against very solid coverage:
https://gfycat.com/IdioticCalmDungenesscrab#?format=gif
I'm a bit less effusive about Browner and his effect. In my view his greatest impact is the kind of flexibility his skill set allows the secondary to practice. The match ups he can present, and the coverages and disguises he allows. As an individual CB, he's the kind of guy Josh would abuse if he could single him out on a consistent basis. I think Patricia realizes this and doesn't allow it to happen. And in so doing it, gets us seeing the "good' Browner mostly and only a minimum of the "bad" Browner.
For Browner he couldn't have wound up in a better place for his career. Like I said he has some unique skills for a CB, but like I've also said, he has flaws that can be exposed if allowed. If he'd had gone to a team like Raiders or Jets, he'd have been the butt of fans hatred after watching him get beat deep several time a game.
There is a reason why I chose his number at the start of TC. I see what he can become down the road. As he improves, that rare kind of potential looks even more reachable, since its become clear that he wants to be that great and seems to have the work ethic to reach it.Jamie Collins is playing at the level that I expected him right now, and has been playing at a very high level for the past 6+ games. He had rough opener against Miami with some fundamentals problems, and then had to deal with a thigh injury. But since the Cincinnati game he has been playing at a Pro Bowl level, IMO. He stepped in as the defensive signal caller against Buffalo as well, and he really started elevating his play around the Denver game.
Now hopefully over the next couple of years, Easley begins to evolve into the impact Warren Sapp like DT I envisioned. I'm hoping that his pedestrian but not bad play is due to a combination of dealing with injuries old and new, plus the need for him to play so much DE. Also the example of Hightower's slow start gives me patience to wait on him.
Amen, brother, but watching teams like the Raiders, Jets, and Jax rise up on odd weeks to beat their supposed betters makes one cautious. And Buffalo and Miami are better teams than most here give them credit for. It wouldn't take much of a slip cause a defeat in a game we SHOULD win. I'm happy to have them both at Gillette.2 wins out of the next 3 (Miami, @Jets, Buffalo) guarantees at least a #2 seed. Denver has @SD and @Cincinnati next. We obviously need to take care of business, but should hopefully be ok.