- Joined
- Dec 4, 2006
- Messages
- 16,482
- Reaction score
- 1,343
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.IMO Hardy is the best WR in the draft. He scores TDs, which is what separates #1 WRs in the NFL from pretenders. He has had some problems getting off the LOS, and some off field issues a couple years ago, but those problems are par for the course and IMO he should figure out how to release given some experience. All that said, he is not a fit for the Pats. He is a poor man's Randy Moss, and we already have the real Randy Moss locked up for 3 years. I think Buffalo would jump at him in rd 2 if he's there, assuming they take a cb at #11.
I like what James has to bring to a team this year and he is projected to go early to mid 2nd round.
Would you want New England to take a shot at this scoring machine with one of their picks in the 2nd?
He could be another great WR and certainly has great size
Eh, we've had our arguments. But I have to warn you that you're going to get crucified for this (see my Mario Manningham thread).
You got "crucified" because of your ignorance. You had your facts wrong about Manningham. Not to mention your internet tough guy attitude because you think that Manningham is some kind of deep threat to line up opposite Moss.
But, hey, keep playing the victim. Its fun to watch and laugh at.
I would never rule out a reciever in this draft because we use so many 3wr sets. That said, a day 2 guy with return abilities would be about all we could afford after other needs are addressed.
LOL, do you realize how badly you just got owned in that thread? But hey, keep calling me ignorant. After all, I am the one that can actually read a post before I respond. Guess that makes me ignorant.
Ahh, the to live in ignorance. It truly must be bliss.
You are the one who had his facts wrong about Manningham. I wasn't the first person to point it out to you. How did you own me again? OH, that's right. You didn't. You just think you did because you live in ignorance.
I read your posts, as laughable as they are. You might want to actually work on that reading comprehension there.
OH, and, you are the maroon who thinks that post count means that someone has no life. I can guarantee you that I have a life and its plenty fulfilling. But, you'd rather show your ignorance by pointing out post count than admitting you had your facts wrong.
Yep. Perhaps I'll take you seriously when you actually debate my facts in there. You sound like a scared child almost. When someone comes along and actually brings several points and puts them in your face, you respond only with "you're ignorant", or "the ignorance must be bliss", or "you can't bring up points because you're so ingorant". So yes, you got owned because the only point you could actually halfassedly (yes, halfassedly... I made it up) debate was whether or not Reggie Bush is a number one back. But then you forget that everyone was crazy about him because he was a DYNAMIC FOOTBALL PLAYER. The Saints already had their traditional RB. They wanted Bush for his skillset which is why he was either in the backfield or split wide as a receiver. So yeah, like I said in the other thread, I can't take you seriously until you can actually debate me and not just sit back and say "IGNORANT, IGNORANT, IGNORANT!!!"
By the way, try to use another word rather than ignorant. Take advantage of the fact that I can't be more colorful with you because my hands are cuffed due to the fact that I post here from work.
When you actually use FACTS, maybe there will be something to debate. Until then, you've proven yourself to be nothing but an ignorant internet tough guy who threatens people just because he thinks he knows better.
1) The Saints took Bush because they wanted HIM to be their #1 over McAllister. Yes, that's right. They wanted Bush to be their #1 and McAllister to be the back-up.
2) Bush is a Poor man's Bryant Westbrook. It was a reach to take him where they did and he proved that he couldn't carry the load in New Orleans once McAllister went down.
3) I don't care if you "take me seriously" or not. You are the one who threw the hissy fit because you were taken to task over your ignorance in the Manningham thread. Ignorance that was posted PRIOR to my saying one word in that thread. So, for you to sit there and claim that I, for some reason, should debate you when you haven't shown you are worth debating, is pretty funny.
OH, btw, I use ignorant because its the best word that describes you. As for you being "more colorful," your excuse it pretty lame. But I have come to expect that from you.