B
BradyToMoss
Guest
They should keep BOTH Stallworth and Moss...long term..THAT would be what is best...
I'm all for that, I just don't see that as being realisitic.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.They should keep BOTH Stallworth and Moss...long term..THAT would be what is best...
Huh? He wouldn't be any better in a Skins uniform than he would have been in Oakland. He's better because he has a HOF QB now. Campbell is hardly someone who is going to help Moss' numbers.
Wouldn't they have to make some mid-season cuts and restructuring of some deals to make something happen before the off season?
I agree, I love Stallworth and what he brings to the table as well as his age, he's still very, very young by NFL standards. But if the Pats pick up his option, I just can't there being any money left over for Randy Terradactle.
That's because you aren't bothering to look at how much money the Pats have in free cap space for next year. You also aren't bothering to take into consideration that the Pats can change the option bonus for both Stallworth and Washington into a signing bonus and spread the hit over the remaining contract. Or the Pats can just cut Washington..
There are many things the Pats can do to free up money.. Including giving Brady an extension...
Which begs the question in 2008 season
27 yr old stallworth vs 32 yr old moss for a 4 yr contract.
Thanks for that dollar grid. Bottom line is this, BB will not invest top dollars into 2 star wideouts, the CAP room just isn't there and I highly doubt both guys will be willing to take the home town discount. BB will have to choose which guy makes more sense for the long term and go with that guy and let Chad Jackson move into the other role.
Ideally, both Stallworth and Moss will be Pats next year, but lets be realistic about who option 1 is in the case this becomes either/or. Moss is 30...and he will be 31 for the duration of the 2008 season..so inking him to a 3-4 extension will take him through ages 33-34..assumng he stays injury free, there's no reason to believe he wont be elite for the duration, if not even longer.
Stallworth is a good receiver, but his ceiling is probably 1.000 Yds for 9-10 TDs...and thats an absolute breakout year. Moss did that in his first season with the Raiders, and people called that a bad season. We're talking two different levels of receiver here.
I'm all for that, I just don't see that as being realisitic.
if stallworth performs and gets cut i assure you that will be the end of deals like stallworth ,dillion,washington and even moss for the patriots. they could never say play 1 yr and prove your are worth your contract in the future.
Not true, Stallworth and Moss knew going in it was one year to showcase themselves for everyone, not just to get paid by the Patriots.
Wouldn't they have to make some mid-season cuts and restructuring of some deals to make something happen before the off season?
If I were you, I'd probably want to see Moss locked into a long term contract before Snyder comes sniffing around willing to throw a ton of draft picks your way. He's an awesome player. Imagine what he could do in a Skins' uniform...
We've done this exercise several times over the last couple of weeks, but I guess you missed it. Stallworth's deal is fine. Don't let the media spin fool you. His option bonus is no different than a signing bonus, and Deion got more in his deal. The cap can be manipulated via conversion to the point he costs less than Deion for a couple of years and a little more at the backend when the cap will be dramatically increasing.
Stallworth is already penciled in via his long term deal, so that is accounted for. Washington is already penciled in on the books at $5.7M next year as well. He isn't going to see that. It would however cover a substantial chunk of Randy's 3-4 year extension. An extension for Colvin would cut his $7M cap in half, providing more than the remainder of Randy's "space" for 2008, and Brady will be extended before 2009 freeing up some cap space for his WR as well. Even if he has to squeeze a little on the defenses budget, that's OK in the presence of an offense that can keep them off the field or routinely defending double digit leads at the half.
Signing one or both of Gay and Samuel is also doable provided neither is looking for a delusional deal. Samuel absent 10 picks and a ton of buzz on a team where the focus this year is on offense may be a lot more reasonable now that he has $8M in the bank. If Rodney remains he will quietly take another cut, as he did this year, and Bruschi may well opt to stay on the one year veteran type deal Junior has been playing under. That would have us operating a pretty well stocked roster with room to spare. We are currently about $6M under the cap, which if not used will be rolled over onto the $7M we were projected to be under the 2008 cap (and that was $13M under with Stallworth and another $5.7M WR ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR on the roster, and before any adjustments like Colvin being extended and several potential simple restructures including to Brady if they need cap).
I think we are in pretty good shape, including to get Gay and Asante (or Wilson) extended or replaced as we choose to while adding a veteran or two to the defense as needed.
Why in the world would he leave the Patriots to play for an inferior NFC team?
We've done this exercise several times over the last couple of weeks, but I guess you missed it. Stallworth's deal is fine. Don't let the media spin fool you. His option bonus is no different than a signing bonus, and Deion got more in his deal. The cap can be manipulated via conversion to the point he costs less than Deion for a couple of years and a little more at the backend when the cap will be dramatically increasing.
Stallworth is already penciled in via his long term deal, so that is accounted for. Washington is already penciled in on the books at $5.7M next year as well. He isn't going to see that. It would however cover a substantial chunk of Randy's 3-4 year extension. An extension for Colvin would cut his $7M cap in half, providing more than the remainder of Randy's "space" for 2008, and Brady will be extended before 2009 freeing up some cap space for his WR as well. Even if he has to squeeze a little on the defenses budget, that's OK in the presence of an offense that can keep them off the field or routinely defending double digit leads at the half.
Signing one or both of Gay and Samuel is also doable provided neither is looking for a delusional deal. Samuel absent 10 picks and a ton of buzz on a team where the focus this year is on offense may be a lot more reasonable now that he has $8M in the bank. If Rodney remains he will quietly take another cut, as he did this year, and Bruschi may well opt to stay on the one year veteran type deal Junior has been playing under. That would have us operating a pretty well stocked roster with room to spare. We are currently about $6M under the cap, which if not used will be rolled over onto the $7M we were projected to be under the 2008 cap (and that was $13M under with Stallworth and another $5.7M WR ALREADY ACCOUNTED FOR on the roster, and before any adjustments like Colvin being extended and several potential simple restructures including to Brady if they need cap).
I think we are in pretty good shape, including to get Gay and Asante (or Wilson) extended or replaced as we choose to while adding a veteran or two to the defense as needed.