- Joined
- Mar 19, 2006
- Messages
- 33,990
- Reaction score
- 14,479
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Oh, I guess I'm a bit of a dip. I was under the impression this deal was a bit EXPENSIVE. You guys think it's below-market? Please expound, I'd love to be wrong.
5 years, 5+ million/year - Adalius Thomas averaged 7 million on his deal. Yeh it's early with his rookie deal, but with Ty playing Pro Bowl level - a steal.Oh, I guess I'm a bit of a dip. I was under the impression this deal was a bit EXPENSIVE. You guys think it's below-market? Please expound, I'd love to be wrong.
5 years, 5+ million/year - Adalius Thomas averaged 7 million on his deal. Yeh it's early with his rookie deal, but with Ty playing Pro Bowl level - a steal.
Well, as PFnV mentioned, compare it to Freeney's deal.Oh, I guess I'm a bit of a dip. I was under the impression this deal was a bit EXPENSIVE. You guys think it's below-market? Please expound, I'd love to be wrong.
If I have to choose one of the three to do without in the future - Samuel, Wilfork, or Warren - I'd do without Samuel every time. Warren and Wilforl are much more critical to the success of the D
The numbers may seem a tad low for an elite defensive lineman. But here’s what needs to be looked at: Warren was due just $2.515 million over the next two years. What that means is that if the deal runs its course, Warren, in essence, is reaping $33.485 million for adding three years on to his contract.
Well, as PFnV mentioned, compare it to Freeney's deal.
Freeney's getting over $11 million a year, including $30 million in guarantees. Now he's a better player, but Warren very good for us in our system. Any way you look at it, we got a deal.