You think the Chiefs will take it to the courts? I'd be willing to bet they don't.
If they have a half decent or team they line the right pockets, and compare this punishment with the punishment for the NYJ's, who were warned in the same league year of their tampering ways, before tampering with a player under contract, on a sb run, with a division rival, on camerax basically quoting the tampering rule text example. Keep in mind said NYJ 2nd offense, resulted in a 100k fine.
I'm not well read on the kc maclin ordeal, but I'm pretty sure it was during the legal tampering period. Of which the dolphins were arguably the worst offenders.
Edit:
All of this occurring in the same league year that the NYJ had their repeated tampering violations. Obviously Roger Dodger wants that to fade from public memory, only to hammer a team for far less. Keep in mind the initial Jets tampering WARNING, came for tampering with Maclin, UNDER CONTRACT, PRIOR TO THE REGULAR SEASON (iirc).
Both NYJ issues seem worse to me. In both instances, the season had not ended, and the team in question was openly courting said player WHILE UNDER CONTRACT TO PLAY A GAME IN THE NEXT MONTH. Chiefs? Tampering period, he was off contract in a day or so. The Briggs issue, there was a trade being negotiated and miscommunication over being able to discuss contracts. The Vikings issue, iirc was an ex chiefs coach saying there were guys he'd want to sign if they were released. Teams in question there, but I don't think he named a specific player.
Presented with the 2 most egregious tampering violations of the last few years? Goody first issues his ex employer, and stepping stone to commish, a warning. The second time in a league year his **** ex employer ****s up hard, 100k fine. Anything based on his own prior punishments docks a 3Rd minimum, swap of 5th.
The sooner the media wakes the **** up and starts undressing this clown, the better.