- Joined
- Jun 24, 2014
- Messages
- 8,479
- Reaction score
- 10,927
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
I wish peeps would come to grips with this. Can you imagine having a beer with Shefter and the subject of GOAT WRs come up. Moss, Sticky, Mega, TO, Harrison, etc. Then you talk about greatest Slot guys all time. Ernest Givens, Charlie Joiner, Throw Welker in there for sure.This feels like revisionist history, guys. Moss and Welker were the most dominating players at their positions, maybe of all time.
This feels like revisionist history, guys. Moss and Welker were the most dominating players at their positions, maybe of all time.
No, and no.Guys are very delusional up here. Put a prime (25ish not 30 yr old)moss with Brady and he goes for 30 tds in a season. Welker at his best was better than Jules at his best imo. Stop the nonsense, yes Welker dropped a SB pass but doesn't take away from the player he was. Give moss and Welker this supporting cast and secondary and there 19-0. And don't forget we were on are way to a loss also until a young man stepped in front of a stupid throw. You can't compare guys when there not given the same weapons around them smh.
The Gronk/Edelman team has better offensive supporting cast. As BB said, double Moss and clog the middle of the field and our offense sputtered, granted it took quite some time for that to happen, but it did prove effective.
Edelman may never give us the consistent 1200-1600 yard seasons that Welker did but he appears to be open even more often and is always there. Gronk is as productive as Moss but it's more about just being a huge beast and less about being an athletic god like Moss was, harder to shut Gronk down IMO. Gifted athlete AND he's 6'6. Scary combo for the NFL.
Plus I prefer the supporting cast of Ridley/Vereen/Blount/Dola/LaFell/Dobson over Gaffney/Stallworth/Watson/Maroney/BJGE/the disaster crew that was 2009.
No, and no.
Why are you making up teams that didn't and never will exist?Anyone who says they'd prefer Gronkowski and JE11... tell me how you would defend against Moss/Welker/Lafell/Dion Lewis/Blount/Amendola.
Why are you making up teams that didn't and never will exist?
Moss was great, but Gronk is far more versatile. Welker was great by JE is more versatile AND more clutch.
You kind of made an argument for Welker/Moss: how would they do with the supporting caste of Lewis/Blount/Chandler/Lafell? And how would Gronk/JE11 do with Maroney/BJGE/Watson?
LoMo? I guess you live in a world where 4.5 is higher than 4.6 and a TD every 30 touches is better than a TD every 17 touches.2007 Maroney was better than 2015 Blount. And 2011 BJGE might have been too.