- Joined
- Mar 21, 2006
- Messages
- 7,939
- Reaction score
- 16,946
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Reiss should leave the X's and O's to somebody else. That's just stupid.
Never happened. That's all speculation by people.Where has there been even the first report that the Patriots have asked Browner to take a pay cut?
Nobody has reported anything that the Patriots are doing besides letting Browner find out his market value. Anything other than that is pure speculation.I have no idea what the Pats are doing here.
Really? Really? Darelle Revis, really?I will be more upset if Browner leaves than if Revis does. Browner is a good value and brings a swagger with him. Revis is great but he is also extremely expensive and on a team that has many good corners waiting in the wings. I'd rather they use his crazy money to sign a real pass rusher and dominate on the line. We have a good backfield with or without Revis
Arrington had tight coverage on Matthews in the SB. He was just too short to win those jump balls. Not surprising that Browner would be able to handle that coverage well. It's the beauty of the backfield they had; they could match up with all types of receivers.For some reason BB like Arrington a lot, I dont think he is bad but when the moved Browner over during the SB things got different quick. I dont like the idea of losing Browner, maybe he wants more money and he is pushing the Pats to release him. I think there are other places to save 4.8 than here.
Not sure if it's been mentioned in this thread, but Reiss was on ESPN and said we could've let Browner test FA because if we don't sign Revis, then we're not gonna play as much press man, which is what Browner does.
So that doesn't sound very good to me.
Rodney is a special player, but Cox wasn't when he came here. So swagger guys do not have to be elite guys. In fact, Cox barely saw the field.
He signed two days after Revis.This line of reasoning makes no sense when you consider that Browner was signed before Revis and after Talib had left. Why'd the acquire him in the first place if his value was dependent on having a true #1?