- Joined
- May 28, 2005
- Messages
- 13,274
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.He's on the D+C show right now.
They asked him about that report awhile back about him wanting to come back, and he said that was a joke on the Felger show. He said the whole "I'll come back if I get a raise" thing was sarcastic, and that there was "no way in hell" he was coming back.
He's on the D+C show right now.
They asked him about that report awhile back about him wanting to come back, and he said that was a joke on the Felger show. He said the whole "I'll come back if I get a raise" thing was sarcastic, and that there was "no way in hell" he was coming back.
Everybody knows he is an idiot,I don't believe him
I know Ted Johnson was a good player for the Pats,and I know he has some problems. But Im getting sick of the media tour..
I understand he's trying to get his point across, but why is there a need to bring Belichick's name into it? He could have gotten his point across a thousand different ways without mentioning Belichick.
Evidently he believes Belichick is, in part, responsible.
BB has been noted to value toughness. What would be a logical error associated with that value, assuming BB can, in fact, make errors? Possibly, being too tough. Creating an expectation that a player will play through injuries they should not play through.
It is also possible this is Ted Johnson's perception, but I do not think he runs around smearing his coach for no reason whatsoever. For a deluded reason? For a drug-magnified reason? Maybe. I wasn't there. If he's addicted to amphetimines, they do have a side effect of paranoia. And anyone who's ever attributed motives and thoughts to a bass that were not there, knows that communication is different from assumed communication. If he thought BB wanted him to play with a concussion, that's different from BB being caught red-handed.
But in terms of your question, why not bring the coach into it, if you believe he should take some of the responsibility? The real question is whether the coach, in this circumstance, is in fact ultimately responsible.
PFnV
Evidently he believes Belichick is, in part, responsible.
BB has been noted to value toughness. What would be a logical error associated with that value, assuming BB can, in fact, make errors? Possibly, being too tough. Creating an expectation that a player will play through injuries they should not play through.
It is also possible this is Ted Johnson's perception, but I do not think he runs around smearing his coach for no reason whatsoever. For a deluded reason? For a drug-magnified reason? Maybe. I wasn't there. If he's addicted to amphetimines, they do have a side effect of paranoia. And anyone who's ever attributed motives and thoughts to a bass that were not there, knows that communication is different from assumed communication. If he thought BB wanted him to play with a concussion, that's different from BB being caught red-handed.
But in terms of your question, why not bring the coach into it, if you believe he should take some of the responsibility? The real question is whether the coach, in this circumstance, is in fact ultimately responsible.
PFnV
Given the frequency that the team uses the IR, this team kills its players, has the worst training staff in the world, or errs on the side of caution. Since I've never heard anything but good things said about the staff itself, that knocks it down to 2 choices.
Now, does putting people on IR at the drop of a hat mean that this team is just crushing these guys to get them hurt at such a rate, or does it mean that they use their depth as a way to augment a precautionary style of dealing with injuries?
I realize that the 4th option of "Just crap luck" exists as well.....
Given the frequency that the team uses the IR, this team kills its players, has the worst training staff in the world, or errs on the side of caution. Since I've never heard anything but good things said about the staff itself, that knocks it down to 2 choices.
Now, does putting people on IR at the drop of a hat mean that this team is just crushing these guys to get them hurt at such a rate, or does it mean that they use their depth as a way to augment a precautionary style of dealing with injuries?
I realize that the 4th option of "Just crap luck" exists as well.....