- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,777
- Reaction score
- 16,591
We have 2 meaningful draft picks, if the 3rd is gone for Sanders. Now you would use the equivalent of our last two picks to draft a wide receiver. Is that because Belichick is so good at evaluating young wide receiver talent.
I would note that unless we trade Mallett or desparately use a next year's pick, we will have our rookie WR and Sanders. This is NOT going to happen.
I would note that unless we trade Mallett or desparately use a next year's pick, we will have our rookie WR and Sanders. This is NOT going to happen.
I really expect us to draft an X receiver that can make a day 1 impact. Whether we trade Mallett or a future draft pick to move up and take an Allen or someone else I cannot say. I compare the WR position to the RDE position last year we let Carter and Anderson walk brought in a JAG's just in case like Scott (WR = Donald Jones) but BB had a player he wanted and moved up to get him. I also think that BB is confident in Amendola/Sanders combo replacing Welker. I really believe there is a bigger plan for that X receiver position though and it is the draft IMO.