resdubwhite
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Oct 27, 2009
- Messages
- 4,681
- Reaction score
- 2,420
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Here's the thing about the draft:
If there's a player you want, you have to take him before someone else does.
Sometimes people call that a reach.
For me, its very intriguing when Belichick likes a guy enough to "reach."
So I don't get all worked up about whether this guy or that guy was a reach. I view the draft as an opportunity to see where he thinks the roster is in term of the team building process.
He normally trades down to accululate more picks, by this method he has rebuilt the core of the team the past few years. This year he traded up twice in the first round. I am infering that he thinks the roster s in good shat & that he really thinks these 2 players will be significent contributors.
BTW given the state of the roster while waiting for today's pick(s), I think we will field a conpetive team when they walk on the field for the season opener against the Titans and have a good chance of winning the division again.
When analyzing the seemingly strange second round for the Patriots--taking a player ranked as a Day Three guy at 48 and trading down for poor value--one needs to pay attention in future years not just to the play of Tavon Wilson, assuming he plays, which I think he will, but the play of the talented guys available at 48 that we passed on.
Like UConn's Reyes, the defensive lineman, taken at 49. Or another DB like Oklahoma's Jamell Fleming, another perfect fit for the Patriots.
I'm convinced taking another Wilson DB from Illinois wasn't merely a reach, it was a panic move. We totally screwed over the Ravens again in the first round by taking Hightower whom they obviously coveted, and perhaps Bill was worried that another team was going to do the same to us with Wilson.
I just think it was going to happen that high in the draft.
The probability is very high--of course impossible to prove--that Wilson is there for us at 62--or well beyond.
Wilson was a need pick but taken earlier than he needed to be. And I'm worried that Belichick is starting to internalize his own press about being a genius.
It's possible everyone was wrong about Wilson. It's possible teams had him ranked much higher than we were led to believe. Having in for a visit, as seven teams are reported to have done, shows a possible interest.
But I believe Belichick likes to stir the pot. I think he enjoyed seeing The Hair (Mel Kiper) rendered speechless. I know Ron Zook from my own sources thinks very highly of the player selected.
And yet...it was a reach. Better players were available for us at 48. And Belichick made a mistake, which I think will be proven in the next few years.
Chandler Jones--Dont'a Hightower--Kendall Reyes/Jamell Fleming. That's what we should have done. It hurts that we didn't get a better player at 48. If I'm wrong, it's likely the Patriots were in taking Wilson when he would very likely have around at 62.
But since the Patriots were apparently not going to keep 62, as events turned out, they were forced to go for the reach and take a player at an obvious HUGE need, safety.
Grade C. Same as Pete Prisco.
FAIL!!
I...am a Mad Bill Devotee.
And I DO lambaste that Pick. :snob:
You have to admit BB has been pretty good about cutting his losses with players when it's clear it's not going to work out. Taylor Price would probably still be on a lot of rosters after investing a 3rd only two drafts ago.
A couple of things:
- I am concerned with whether a player is a reach for the simple reason that I don't want to pay Mercedes money for a Toyota when I can pay Toyota money for a Toyota. I believe how well a team manages their personnel to be critically important to their chances of Superbowl success, and wasted draft capital means that capital cannot be applied elsewhere.
!
A couple of things:
- I am concerned with whether a player is a reach for the simple reason that I don't want to pay Mercedes money for a Toyota when I can pay Toyota money for a Toyota. I believe how well a team manages their personnel to be critically important to their chances of Superbowl success, and wasted draft capital means that capital cannot be applied elsewhere.
- I also believe that we will field a competitive team that will win the division, but I'm more concerned with whether or not we could have been in a better position to win the Superbowl!
It seems as if we go through this every year.
1.) Kiper's excellent at what he does.
2.) The pick was a huge reach.
3.) Time will tell if the reach works out.
Seriously?
Another argument here is that Belichick knows more than us, and more than the analysts. Absolutely. That's correct. But, anyone see the couple hundred hours of NFL draft programming? See the magazines? The websites? This is not the NFL draft over the phone from 1967. This is now a big industry. Analysts are paid to track a thousand or more prospects. They watch tape. They go to the Combine. They speak to coaches. They consult with guys like Polian and Casserly who have built teams.
If by "reach" you mean that they drafted him earlier than they could have, you have no way of knowing that. They felt he was going to be taken between 48 and 62 and made their decision to take him at 48. They may have tried to move down 3 or 4 spots, we'll never know that. But they were not comfortable waiting until 62.
the difference being, you can't build another one on the assembly line. You may think that from a draft guide, but they wanted this player, thought another team in position did too, so they made the move.
They are obviously in the mode of targetting players to fit (two move ups in round 1). They've drafted multitudes in recent years and had some hits, but they just aren't bothereing with a massive draft class they will cut half of this year.
They need a safety, they want this one. Versatile, team captain, good character, attitude, apparently.
Mankins, Villmer and Solder were all reaches, should we have waited and taken a chance on toehr teams drafting them?
The bottom line is the roster we field on opening day.
Barring injuries I think this will be the strongest roster in the NFL.
Thanks is all I care about.
I can't wait to see Kiper whining when we stomp the Ravens this year.
A couple of things:
- I am concerned with whether a player is a reach for the simple reason that I don't want to pay Mercedes money for a Toyota when I can pay Toyota money for a Toyota.
We don't know what they were "comfortable" with, and that's completely irrelevant to whether or not the pick was a reach. We know that they drafted a kid in round 2 when he was projected at the bottom of the draft or a UDFA. That's a reach, and playing the "but you don't know..." card doesn't change that.
It is what it is.
We don't know what they were "comfortable" with, and that's completely irrelevant to whether or not the pick was a reach. We know that they drafted a kid in round 2 when he was projected at the bottom of the draft or a UDFA. That's a reach, and playing the "but you don't know..." card doesn't change that.
It is what it is.
Mankins, Vollmer, and Solder could all play, and they did immediately. Wilson sucks, I'd be interested to see how many snaps he gets this season.
We don't know what they were "comfortable" with, and that's completely irrelevant to whether or not the pick was a reach. We know that they drafted a kid in round 2 when he was projected at the bottom of the draft or a UDFA. That's a reach, and playing the "but you don't know..." card doesn't change that.
It is what it is.
From NFLN
"They love his versatility and they love his toughness"