VJCPatriot
Pro Bowl Player
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2006
- Messages
- 16,806
- Reaction score
- 5,483
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'd say this says Galloway still has a chance - cutting him doesn't save any money as he's vested. Now, keeping him does give you someone to cut if you need a roster slot (if Tate or LeVoir were to be activated), but if he's practicing it also means he could be working through his issues with Tommy. It's not a good situation for him, but I don't think it's the death bell until he's actually cut.This cinches it.. Galloway is gone.
With Sanders out, do we see extended time for Chung in the dime?
It has nothing to do with the rain. If you keep a player, especially a WR, inactive for 3 games in a row.. any chance at developing game timing, rapport, and being on the same page, is long gone.
I would be very very surprised to find out the Thomas is out due to his play. While maybe not spectacular I still do not believe he deserves the bashing he has gotten this week. I do not see a replacement better then him.
There must be something else here that we do not know
I've seen were he might be dealing with a critical family situation - if he needs time for that I'm good and I'm glad Bill is too.No Adalius???? WTF. That can't be good.
Actually it's more the wind and absolutely it DOES make a difference..no need for a 5th WR in rain wind...NOT a passing type game...and it doesn't matter IF the 3 CBs are down..the long ball is going nowhere in the wind..Will he go to London?? If he does..I bet he will play...but..it just doesn't suit it for this type of game...It has nothing to do with the rain. If you keep a player, especially a WR, inactive for 3 games in a row.. any chance at developing game timing, rapport, and being on the same page, is long gone.
With Sanders out, do we see extended time for Chung in the dime?
I'd say this says Galloway still has a chance - cutting him doesn't save any money as he's vested. Now, keeping him does give you someone to cut if you need a roster slot (if Tate or LeVoir were to be activated), but if he's practicing it also means he could be working through his issues with Tommy. It's not a good situation for him, but I don't think it's the death bell until he's actually cut.
I've seen were he might be dealing with a critical family situation - if he needs time for that I'm good and I'm glad Bill is too.
Actually it's more the wind and absolutely it DOES make a difference..no need for a 5th WR in rain wind...NOT a passing type game...and it doesn't matter IF the 3 CBs are down..the long ball is going nowhere in the wind..Will he go to London?? If he does..I bet he will play...but..it just doesn't suit it for this type of game...
So the big free-agent bonanza signing we gave a multi-million dollar contract to in 07, ends up being a healthy inactive....money well spent!
Call me stupid, I haven't been paying much attention to the Pats in the last week. But, is Seau playing?
Yeah that's what it seemed like to me...as for Joey I think hes still got a chance and won't be cut unless someone is activated off the pup but remember that is a three week windowI've seen were he might be dealing with a critical family situation - if he needs time for that I'm good and I'm glad Bill is too.
:wha: what happened to you ?
Studying for exams. When you're trying to get into the Ivy League, that makes the decision 50-50 and school somehow won. So is Seau playing?
I would think so since hes active and Thomas is not playing....in what role well we will have to wait and see.Studying for exams. When you're trying to get into the Ivy League, that makes the decision 50-50 and school somehow won. So is Seau playing?