- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
Seymour is versatile enought to play NT.. But he's listed as a DE.. SO for the agrument he's (ngata) a DE.. not a NT.. So my logic is based of fact.. Read my above post with the link from the team website.. He's not their NT.. if you watch a game you will notice it..
Actually, I do think that Seymour would have been one of the better 3-4 NTs out there, but what's the point? At NT, he couldn't leverage his greatest strengths, and it's better to have the best 3-4 DE in the game than a good NT. That said, it's a moot point since Seymour simply didn't play NT; it's all speculation. Ngata, OTOH, has played most of his career naps at NT.