- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 31,024
- Reaction score
- 15,584
I'm curious here what y'all think. Here are the three ground rules for what I consider "realistic."
(1) Mayo's promise that their first pick will be an "impact player" on offense holds true.
(2) Trades are allowed, but must be consistent with (1) and must be realistic (they get no less than 2000 points total back in a trade [using the original chart]).
(3) No absurd reaches (e.g., no second-rounders at 3). I'm going to give Mayo the benefit of the doubt and assume he won't do something that stupid, just like Belichick never did with top 16 picks.
All you need to do is come up with the WTFiest draft you can. You only need to say what the Pats do with 3 and 34, but can go further if you want.
I'll post mine in a day or so.
(1) Mayo's promise that their first pick will be an "impact player" on offense holds true.
(2) Trades are allowed, but must be consistent with (1) and must be realistic (they get no less than 2000 points total back in a trade [using the original chart]).
(3) No absurd reaches (e.g., no second-rounders at 3). I'm going to give Mayo the benefit of the doubt and assume he won't do something that stupid, just like Belichick never did with top 16 picks.
All you need to do is come up with the WTFiest draft you can. You only need to say what the Pats do with 3 and 34, but can go further if you want.
I'll post mine in a day or so.