FSUPatsFan
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2006
- Messages
- 725
- Reaction score
- 0
Here's what Bill Simmons had to say about Branch. Its pretty much what pats fans have been saying all along. Sure he may be a Pats fans, but I think he always puts things in good perspective for all teams. He was dead on about Art Shell a week ago. The rest of the article is really good as well. Heres the link.
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060915
http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=simmons/060915
Seattle made one of the all-time panic trades, barely beating the Lions in Detroit, then panicking and ponying up an unprotected No. 1 for Deion Branch 24 hours later. Now, I like Deion Branch. Great teammate, great guy, came through in some big playoff games. But he's a possession receiver, rarely makes big plays (only five TDs last year) and dropped a surprising amount of balls last year. He's a slightly better, younger version of Bobby Engram ... who's already on the Seahawks. Since when did teams start trading No. 1's for possession receivers? Why would Seattle think it's a good idea to shell out a No. 1 pick, a No. 3 pick and $18 million in guaranteed bonuses to two non-No. 1 receivers (Nate Burleson and Deion Branch) when it could have used that money to re-sign Steve Hutchinson, saved the picks and gone with some patchwork guys? It's like Isiah Thomas took over the team.
(As for the Patriots, apparently their season is over because they don't have an elite receiver anymore ... even though they won the Super Bowl five years ago with Troy Brown and David Patten as the starters and Fred Coleman as the No. 3 guy. Gimme a break. I wrote last week that I would have taken a No. 2 for Branch and been done with it. Getting a No. 1 was gravy. He was valuable, but he wasn't invaluable. There's a difference.)