RelocatedPatFan
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 6,913
- Reaction score
- 5,724
So you are arguing with me or against meI mean, I get that you can only play who's on your schedule. You're right about that. But think about it. It's really hard to hold ANY team in the NFL to the kind of numbers the Patriots have.
Pittsburgh
- Averaged 23.0 points a game against non-NE teams. Scored 3 points against NE. (with Roethlisberger)
- Averaged 250.0 yards a game against non-NE teams. Gained 308 yards against NE. (with Roethlisberger)
Miami
- Averaged 8.0 points a game against non-NE teams. Scored 0 points against NE.
- Averaged 241.5 yards a game against non-NE teams. Gained 184 yards against NE. (95 in garbage time)
NY Jets
- Averaged 9.5 points a game against non-NE teams. Scored 0 points against NE. (scored by the offense)
- Averaged 242.5 yards a game against non-NE teams. Gained 105 yards against NE.
So in total, these three teams have averaged:
- 13.5 points a game against non-NE teams
- 244.7 yards a game against non-NE teams
But against the Patriots, these teams' offenses have produced:
- 1.0 points a game against NE
- 199.0 yards a game against NE
So yeah, these three teams' offenses stink. But it's one thing if the Pats had held them to 13.5 points and 244.7 yards a game. That would be "average" against them. But the Pats have basically completely shut these offenses down COMPLETELY. You just don't do that on a week-in, week-out basis in the NFL. But they have.
In other words, yes, they've played bad competition, but they're utterly DOMINATING this bad competition in ways that their other opponents haven't. You almost literally can't do better than the Pats' D has been doing so far.
I appreciate the detail/context you added, but my comment was these are professional football teams and they dominated them.