- Joined
- Sep 7, 2006
- Messages
- 68,349
- Reaction score
- 105,339
I noticed the same thing.Looks like it is turning into a mecca for medical facilities..
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I noticed the same thing.Looks like it is turning into a mecca for medical facilities..
I didn't see the above article, but it sure seems to me that income taxes alone will pay for a huge chunk of the cost of the stadium.The only viable argument for this sort of thing is the state income tax, but according to the article above the cost of the stadium will dwarf the income received from state taxes. So, the question is, how much money do you want to lose to enrich a guy who is worth $7billion+?
If tax revenue is net zero, it paid for itself. It’s much more than net zero, you are dismissing myriad sources of tax revenue by having a multi million dollar operation with a multi million dollar payroll in the community.Tax revenue is a net nothing. Plenty of studies have proven this. I mean, the revenue comes from local sources any way you cut it.
The only viable argument for this sort of thing is the state income tax, but according to the article above the cost of the stadium will dwarf the income received from state taxes. So, the question is, how much money do you want to lose to enrich a guy who is worth $7billion+?
BTW--your estimate of costs for a Bills game is way over. It's about $75 a game for seasons in the 2nd tier. Parking is on peoples lawns on $10 a pop shared by 4 people in a car. Food is what you bring to the game. Not much of this other than the $75 game ticket is going to generate local tax. The only extra comes from the 15% of the season ticket base that lives in Ontario. You generate income that way.
Taxing the visiting players would increase that by 50%.I didn't see the above article, but it sure seems to me that income taxes alone will pay for a huge chunk of the cost of the stadium.
NY State's top tier income tax is 10.9%. Most athlete income will be in the 9.65% to 10.3% bracket so let's just use a nice round 10% tax. If you assume the Bills payroll is $200 million (which is a conservative estimate) and increases $10 million per year (a conservative estimate) for 30 years (presumed life of the stadium) then that's over $1 billion in income taxes from the Bills players alone.
Don't forget they tax visiting players too for games played in NY State. Plus they will obviously be taxing everyone's income, not just the players.
The article linked at the start of the thread goes into the rationale. Seems riverside it would cost $350M more and take 2-3 years more to build. Seems the team is happy with the Orchard Park situation. Seems changing the location interjects a risk of the unknown.I am also mystified why they're not considering a downtown stadium since that area of the city is really beginning to buzz. This has just been built adjacent to the land targeted for a downtown stadium: Buffalo Riverworks
I've gone down there plenty and there are a ton of people milling around. A stadium next door would finally connect this part of town to the Inner Harbor where the Sabres play at First Bank Arena. It's a missed opportunity.
There are also a lot more highways and roads to access this part of downtown (3 highways & a 6 lane road -- Broadway) than there are for Orchard Park (2 highways).
I believe this has to do with the expense of building downtown, but it also speaks to Pegula's unwillingness to pony up some money, and his safe bet that he can continue to attract tablebreakers rather than worrying about who will show up downtown.
And if the Billdos score a TD, money shot!
- Bills fans love to throw "marital aids" onto the field, so build a giant one, reminiscent of the lighthouse at Gillette, at one end of the stadium. If the budget allows for it, have it buzz on defensive 3rd downs to fire up the crowd.
I am also mystified why they're not considering a downtown stadium since that area of the city is really beginning to buzz. This has just been built adjacent to the land targeted for a downtown stadium: Buffalo Riverworks
I've gone down there plenty and there are a ton of people milling around. A stadium next door would finally connect this part of town to the Inner Harbor where the Sabres play at First Bank Arena. It's a missed opportunity.
There are also a lot more highways and roads to access this part of downtown (3 highways & a 6 lane road -- Broadway) than there are for Orchard Park (2 highways).
I believe this has to do with the expense of building downtown, but it also speaks to Pegula's unwillingness to pony up some money, and his safe bet that he can continue to attract tablebreakers rather than worrying about who will show up downtown.
BTW--your estimate of costs for a Bills game is way over. It's about $75 a game for seasons in the 2nd tier. Parking is on peoples lawns on $10 a pop shared by 4 people in a car. Food is what you bring to the game. Not much of this other than the $75 game ticket is going to generate local tax. The only extra comes from the 15% of the season ticket base that lives in Ontario. You generate income that way.
Oh brother...PS, Ashley i'm very sorry for typing my opinion. I'll try to keep that to a minimum. I know me talking is a no-no.
Factor in the surplus excise taxes greedy NY state collects on Bills Mafia game day staples:I didn't see the above article, but it sure seems to me that income taxes alone will pay for a huge chunk of the cost of the stadium.
NY State's top tier income tax is 10.9%. Most athlete income will be in the 9.65% to 10.3% bracket so let's just use a nice round 10% tax. If you assume the Bills payroll is $200 million (which is a conservative estimate) and increases $10 million per year (a conservative estimate) for 30 years (presumed life of the stadium) then that's over $1 billion in income taxes from the Bills players alone.
Don't forget they tax visiting players too for games played in NY State. Plus they will obviously be taxing everyone's income, not just the players.
I hope it is a dome. Look at the wonders it has done for the VikingsIs it gonna be a dome? If so kick the Bills out of the division.
If visiting players get taxed too then that means the Bills do not get taxed for out of state games, doesn't it? Maybe not. Living in NY though I bet they don't get taxed because I've dealt with this situation myself when work was done out of state. As long as your work in NY isn't repeated over the year, you're fine.I didn't see the above article, but it sure seems to me that income taxes alone will pay for a huge chunk of the cost of the stadium.
NY State's top tier income tax is 10.9%. Most athlete income will be in the 9.65% to 10.3% bracket so let's just use a nice round 10% tax. If you assume the Bills payroll is $200 million (which is a conservative estimate) and increases $10 million per year (a conservative estimate) for 30 years (presumed life of the stadium) then that's over $1 billion in income taxes from the Bills players alone.
Don't forget they tax visiting players too for games played in NY State. Plus they will obviously be taxing everyone's income, not just the players.
Season tickets, ever heard of them?Lots of wrong information here. Bills average ticket is $101 per seat (yeah you can get nosebleeds for $75, but the average price is what you want to use in calculations - not nosebleed pricing). As for parking, yes there is parking on people's lawns but the VAST majority of parking is done at the stadium lot with nearly 15,000 parking spots.
Food/Drink isn't allowed in the stadium (unless its a single serve sandwhich/soda and hasnt for a long time). The line for concessions is always stupid long as well.
I have literally no idea where you got this idea that Bills fans pay $75 per ticket, all park on peoples lawns, and carry coolers full of hot dogs and beer into the stadium. Did you last go to a stadium in the 1950's or something???
PS, again, I apologize for posting my opinion.
The area proposed for the downtown stadium is bigger than the current footprint in Orchard Park. We're talking about many acres of empty industrial park and the abandoned Perry St Projects. The only question about downtown has ever been road access, not space. Because there's more space in the area behind the Seneca Casino all the way down to the river by the park.You're right that downtown Buffalo is starting to buzz again, but you ignored the part where the entire culture of the Bills fanbase changes if the stadium is moved downtown.
80k people tailgate around the stadium each Sunday in Orchard Park.
This couldn't happen downtown.
PS, Ashley i'm very sorry for typing my opinion. I'll try to keep that to a minimum. I know me talking is a no-no.
If they do tax the visitors how do they treat Bills income from away games? When we had dual domiciles and earned in both Michigan and NY state, NY didn't tax our Michigan revenue because we fell under the threshold (it depends on how many days you worked in Michigan).Taxing the visiting players would increase that by 50%.
How many studies do you want me to link to that show there is no local tax gain?If tax revenue is net zero, it paid for itself. It’s much more than net zero, you are dismissing myriad sources of tax revenue by having a multi million dollar operation with a multi million dollar payroll in the community.
Yeah, no one buys concessions at a bills game and they don’t sell hats, jerseys, etc. I also seriously doubt the Bills gave no parking lots and won’t include them in the new stadium. Gillette charges $40 a car.
But all of that is dwarfed by the benefits to local businesses of having a football team in the community.
You aren’t enriching the owner, unless you can’t critically think. You are enriching your community because if you don’t do it, the owner will take the team elsewhere to a community that understands its value.
The roads are already in place for downtown, as I wrote earlier. I could see a problem only with Monday night games, but Buffalo's business district is relatively empty on Sundays. There are 3 highways (190, 33, 5) leading to the downtown plot and a few major roads (Broadway, etc.)I don't know anything about the local geography, but building it on the same plot makes sense because the roads are already in place. The years of construction will be messy but then, like the Patriots and Giants/Jets, the footprint of the old stadium becomes parking lot.
It'll be interesting to see what kind of ROI the City of Worcester and MA realizes from it's respective contributions to the construction of Polar Park. Of the total cost of $160m, the city kicked in $88m, Fenway Sports $61m and the State of MA $11m.