GoWesleyan
Practice Squad Player
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2005
- Messages
- 107
- Reaction score
- 0
I've always bristled at accusations that the Pat's were cheap for not going after marquee players, since they spent on the middle class and depth players, but that ALL CHANGES IF THEY DON'T SPEND TO THE CAP.
There can be no argument that spending to the cap gives you a better chance of winning.
If the GM doesn't spend to the cap, he is not doing his job of putting the best possible team on the field (and compensating them in a way that gives you the best possible chance you have of retaining them.)
Agreed?
There can be no argument that spending to the cap gives you a better chance of winning.
If the GM doesn't spend to the cap, he is not doing his job of putting the best possible team on the field (and compensating them in a way that gives you the best possible chance you have of retaining them.)
Agreed?