I know you’re being a wise ass, but you’re right it is for wimps. Or more accurately, trying to impose your wimpness on others through lawsuits, bans, shaming, is a real downer. Throughout history man has CHOSEN to engage in activities that have proven dangerous to their health (smoking, drinking, sports, mountain climbing, sky diving, extreme skiing, running with the bulls – I think you get the point). Why have we now become a society of studies, expert opinions, and mass hysteria seeking to take away an individual’s choice to engage in dangerous activities? If it’s for education, fine. If it’s to restrict individual choice, not fine. If it's to remove personal responsibility, not fine again.
I actually agree with nearly all of that, though I would have phrased much of it differently and wouldn't have characterized those who disagree in pejorative terms.
I think adults should have as few restrictions on their individual choices as a civilized society can tolerate, i.e., we can't go around killing or assaulting each other, we should stop at red lights, pay our taxes, not steal, etc. But, in general, the choices of mentally stable adults should be respected as long as they don't infringe on the well-being or rights of others, as that well-being and those rights are defined by a free society.
When I was a kid, people didn't know that smoking could kill you or, at best, would likely damage your long term health. Now we know that to be the case. But, that doesn't mean that adults shouldn't still be free to smoke as long as they don't do so in a way that exposes others unwillingly to harm and are willing to pay taxes on their cigarettes that, in part, help defray the costs to society of smoking-related illnesses in those who can't afford insurance. Because of the risks, society also has the right and obligation to restrict access to cigarettes by minors.
We now know the risks of excessive alcohol intake as well as the risks of obesity related to food intake. But, people are still free to eat themselves to death as long as society is willing to tolerate the related insurance costs (Diet-related, Type 2 Diabetes is now among the most prevalent diseases in the US) and to drink themselves to death as long as they don't get behind the wheel of a car and endanger others. Once again, society has the right and obligation to limit the access of minors to alcohol.
Mountain Climbing, Sky Diving, Extreme Skiing are all endeavors whose risks have been known for decades and, as long as they are undertaken responsibly, adults can do so at their own peril. Minors can do so with the permission of their parents or guardians.
Now, we're coming into a new age of awareness of the risks associated with "American" Football.
To me, this means that adults should be free to play the sport to their hearts' content, as long as they are fully aware of the risks.
But it also means that parents and guardians have the right to give or not give permission to their minor children to play the sport, depending on their own views. In addition, it means that leagues and teams for young people should have to disclose the risks associated with the sport to the parents who are giving that permission.