bormio
Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
- Joined
- May 9, 2016
- Messages
- 5,007
- Reaction score
- 8,262
Yeah he would not get a rematch between KC and the Pats.They'll want to keep that ******* away from Foxboro for a while.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Yeah he would not get a rematch between KC and the Pats.They'll want to keep that ******* away from Foxboro for a while.
Because they didn't rule it a score on the field, so there was no score to review.I thought every scoring play is reviewed automatically. Harry scored, so why wasn't it reviewed?
Absolute ********. Call should have been overturned in N.Y.
That is a real stupid feature of the replay rules - usually come into play on plays where the question was the player down before crossing the goal. They should review both ends of the call.Because they didn't rule it a score on the field, so there was no score to review.
If there is a clear recovery, I believe the fumble is allowed. If there is a scrum - no.Not sure if this question has been asked or answered, but on the Kelce fumble, the play was whistled dead before the NE recovery. So why was NE entitled to the recovery?
(Obviously I think the right thing would have been for NE to get a TD on the play).
If he is retiring, I'm surprised that the hasn't announced it as his last run or implied -- like Gronk -- that he will evaluate after the season.I think he may be retiring after this year. He just bought that home in Greenwich and has been knocking down the price off his home in Brookline. If true, I can see why he’s not interested in breaking in rookie WRs and is grumpy that they didn’t get better weapons for him.
A replay showing it was indeed a fumble is enough to overturn what was called on the field (runner down by contact/whistled down) -- however, what it cannot affect, is any advancing of the ball that took place by the recovering team. That's how I believe it works.Not sure if this question has been asked or answered, but on the Kelce fumble, the play was whistled dead before the NE recovery. So why was NE entitled to the recovery?
(Obviously I think the right thing would have been for NE to get a TD on the play).
If he is retiring, I'm surprised that the hasn't announced it as his last run or implied -- like Gronk -- that he will evaluate after the season.
If he plans to keep playing, it is a shame he isn't taking the younger players under his wing. With his play declining, I'm not sure many teams are willing to jettison their current long-term plan to have him sign for a year and then suddenly retire.
After looking across the league, there are only a handful of teams that would likely ditch their quarterback for a short-term solution. Of those, I can only see Brady agreeing to play for Tennessee, San Diego, and Chicago.
There are also the L.A. Rams and Minnesota if they are willing to take a significant cap hit by cutting Goff or Cousins. Beyond the cap hit, though, I can't see teams with an 8-5 and 9-4 record dumping a guy who can play for the foreseeable future to see if Brady can adapt to a new offense and personnel at 43 years old.
Also overlooked: he jacked up his hip on that play.
What is the difference between expectation and hoping for the best?Right now there shouldn’t be any super bowl expectations with this team. It’s basically hope for the best.
Brady isn’t going anywhereTeams are gonna take a shot with brady if he doesn’t come back with the pats. A one year shot.
What is the difference between expectation and hoping for the best?