Recent content by LF911SC

Over two seasons

Those two clowns are the only two who think that. It is a penalty and was the right call. Love that the idiots think the refs should have looked the other way. That in their minds not throwing a flag on a play that had a clear cut penalty in it would have been fair, would have made more...

Yeah, thats what happened here and during the game. By ladies, go back to your ***********

Not trolling. Unless your definition is anyone not in you ***********. I haven't said a thing wrong, I didn't say a thing trying to get a response. Unless you don't have a clue what a troll is or does. Sensitive little whiners.

Why, if he was wrong it helps your whine how?

You are an idiot if you think it was called as many times as you claim. Or 12. You are wrong.

You can't seem to grasp that rules apply to your team and the flag was thrown because they committed a penalty and lead to a loss. As someone on the low end of the gene pool I understand it, you don't get it. Where does that leave you?

He meant it came up within the competition committee, not in games. They wanted to change it for years and couldn't agree on a different rule. Makes no difference, rule was right, call was legit

And the first drive in OT? 6 points after the half. The game does not say that. Without help the Pats struggled to score on the Jets in both games. Neither game said more likely than not the Pats would score.

OK then, whatever, I don't believe for a second that it was called that many times per season. And the point was not knowing a rule doesn't make it something that shouldn't be called, not how many times it was called.

Not getting why anyone is so sure the Pats would move into FG position as if it were a given. The game didn't say that. Given that Rex admitted he didn't know who was flagged, highly unlikely that they alerted anyone. I didn't know the tuck rule but I argued a rule is a rule and the call...

Never, you? Changing the topic works for you?

Jets homer glasses? What possibly makes you sure the Pats would have won without the call? The Jets owned every stat advantage, don't make it out that they needed help. They won the game, the homers are the ones crying that a win was taken away.

This is more whining than football, don't you think? Have an issue with what I posted?

Actually, the Jets outplayed the Pats and if not for a dive and a hideous OPI call in the EZ the game would have been decided a lot earlier. The rule is the rule and it was called as it should have been called. The real whining started when Belichick had to be taught the rule