- Joined
- Sep 10, 2006
- Messages
- 16,238
- Reaction score
- 33,794
Some might not agree with the premise but I think winning 3 SBs and losing 0 is superior to winning 3 and losing 2. It pains me to say it, it really does. Maybe you disagree.
Either way I'm curious what people think it would take for Brady to overtake Montana not just for yourself but for the average fan. There are people who will never agree that Brady is better than Montana or who discount all pre-spygate victories entirely and that's fine. It's hard to imagine a scenario where Brady wins enough to ever sway those people.
But for the average fan will 4 wins and 2 losses be considered superior to 3-0?
Is anything but another SB enough to propel Brady past Montana?
Either way I'm curious what people think it would take for Brady to overtake Montana not just for yourself but for the average fan. There are people who will never agree that Brady is better than Montana or who discount all pre-spygate victories entirely and that's fine. It's hard to imagine a scenario where Brady wins enough to ever sway those people.
But for the average fan will 4 wins and 2 losses be considered superior to 3-0?
Is anything but another SB enough to propel Brady past Montana?