- Joined
- Oct 20, 2007
- Messages
- 29,794
- Reaction score
- 20,459
You are also assuming that Maroney 0 while PlowGuy gets 3, but that isnt really the case either.
Maroney does get stopped for a short loss/no gain more frequently than our other RBs. I'm just challenging the relevance of that, since the difference between 3rd and 11 and 3rd and 9 is pretty negligible. On 1st and 10, any run of less than 4 yards is a 'fail'. On 2nd and 10, any run of less than 6 yards is a 'fail'.
That is the irony. The reason Maroneys #s are better is the exact part of his game he gets criticized for. The best RBs in the NFL have a 40% fail ratio, and the average is 50+.
Maroney turns nothing into something sometimes, but the times there are nothing, he danced, as if that caused the blocking to not be there.
Yeah, I think people in general just have trouble grasping the concepts of percentages on this board. Whether or not a decision was correct is not dependent on the outcome- it's dependent upon the odds that you left yourself with. In every single facet of the game, Belichick plays the odds better than anyone else, IMO. It's all about accepting that there are elements of the game that are out of your control and absolutely crushing the things that are within your control. It's the same philosophy for why he's such a slave-driver about not committing penalties. Some guys might look at it and say "a 5 yard penalty isn't going to put points on the board" or "it was worth it to get my guys fired up", but Belichick understands that those five yards are important in playing the percentages w/ the field position battle.
A family friend that works in the Patriots organization once said that a large part of the reason why they decided to draft Gostkowski and let Vinatieri go was because they felt that Gostkowski had a bunch of value on kickoffs, where he could consistently get them those few extra yards of field position at the start of each drive. Something as seemingly small as that was a significant factor in their decision to let Vinatieri walk (was Vinatieri even doing kickoffs at that point? I seem to recall that he wasn't). That's the kind of level that the Pats' coaching staff is thinking about.
For people that understand that type of systematic thinking, Belichick's coaching style and drafting strategy make a whole lot of sense. For people who don't understand that..., well, they end up making broad decisions off of sweeping generalizations that are supported by anecdotal evidence and tiny sample sizes.
Last edited: