Ok, this isnâ€™t meant to be a whiner post complaining about how much the Pats suck and how awesome the Jets are. But dating back to the middle of last year, I had to start wondering how the Jets went from a below average D to one of the best in the league in just one season. Meanwhile, the Pats have been fielding the same average to slightly-above-average defense for the last 4-5 years. When you look at the players, the Jets clearly have an advantage in a few areas, but itâ€™s not like they have overwhelming better players (at least IMO). Which leads me to believe itâ€™s more scheme based than anything else. What do you all think? Again, Iâ€™d like this to be a legit forum of discussion. So please letâ€™s not derail this with â€śThe Pats D did enough to win, Brady suckedâ€ť discussion (if it can be called â€śdiscussionâ€ť). Iâ€™m more interested in comparing the two defenses and what it is the Jets do so different/better and if we think the Pats will look to incorporate some of their concepts or stick with the status quo.